Randomized phase II study of R-CHOP plus enzastaurin versus R-CHOP in the first-line treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Preliminary analysis.

Authors

null

J. D. Hainsworth

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

J. D. Hainsworth , E. Arrowsmith , M. McCleod , L. Fayad , O. Hamid , L. Davis , B. K. Lin

Organizations

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, Chattanooga Oncology Hematology Associates, Chattanooga, TN, Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN, i3 Statprobe, Burlington, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The combination of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP) is widely used as standard of care for DLBCL; however, long-term survival is low in patients (pts) with high (IPI) risk scores. Enzastaurin (ENZ) targets protein kinase C-β (PKCβ), an enzyme correlated with poor pt outcomes in DLBCL. In this trial, we compared the results of first-line treatment with R-CHOP + ENZ to standard R-CHOP. Methods: DLBCL pts were required to have intermediate or high-risk IPI scores (2-5). Pts were randomized (3:2 ratio) to receive six 21-day cycles of either R-CHOP plus ENZ therapy (Arm A) or R-CHOP alone (Arm B). After 6 cycles, responders in Arm A could continue single agent ENZ. An 1125 mg oral loading dose of ENZ was given on Day 2 followed by 500 mg ENZ daily. Response was evaluated (IWG criteria, 1999) q8 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Randomization of 100 pts allowed detection of an improvement in the PFS at 2 years from 65% (R-CHOP) to 80% with R-CHOP + ENZ (80% power, 1-sided alpha 0.2). This preliminary analysis was performed after all pts had completed R-CHOP chemotherapy, and had been followed for at least one year. Results: Pt characteristics were comparable in Arm A (N=57) and Arm B (N=43). 65 pts (65%) had either high-intermediate (44%) or high (21%) IPI risk scores. The median PFS has not yet been reached; however, the 1-year PFS rate for Arm A was 71% (CI 0.58, 0.84) and Arm B 52% (CI 0.35, 0.69). Overall response rates for Arms A and B were 80.4% and 83.3%, respectively; complete response rates were 35.7% and 26.2%. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (56.1% vs 51.1%) and thrombocytopenia (17.5% vs 13.9%) (Arm A vs Arm B). In Arm A 23% and in Arm B 9.3% of pts had grade 3/4 infection-related complications. In Arm A 4 pts died (sepsis 2, pulmonary embolism 1, and ARDS 1) and in Arm B 3 pts (sepsis 2, pneumonia 1). Conclusions: This preliminary analysis suggests an improvement in PFS and complete response rate for pts with intermediate or high risk DLBCL treated with R-CHOP + ENZ when compared to R-CHOP, with comparable toxicity profiles. The final analysis will be conducted after 2-year followup.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00451178

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 8016)

Abstract #

8016

Poster Bd #

2

Abstract Disclosures