Nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): 4 year (yr) follow-up of CheckMate 649.

Authors

Kohei Shitara

Kohei Shitara

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Kohei Shitara , Markus H. Moehler , Jaffer A. Ajani , Lin Shen , Marcelo Garrido , Carlos Gallardo , Lucjan S. Wyrwicz , Kensei Yamaguchi , James M. Cleary , Elena Elimova , Ricardo Elias Bruges Maya , Michalis Karamouzis , Tomasz Skoczylas , Arinilda Bragagnoli , Tianshu Liu , Mustapha Tehfe , Kynan Feeney , Rui Wang , Raheel Nathani , Yelena Y. Janjigian

Organizations

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Johannes Gutenberg-University Clinic, Mainz, Germany, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China, SAGA Clinical Trial Centre and Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile, Fundacion Arturo López Pérez, Providencia, Chile, Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii, Narodowy Instytut Onkologii, Warszawa, Poland, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Instituto Nacional De Cancerología, Bogota, Colombia, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece, II Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Gastroenterologicznej i Nowotworów Układu Pokarmowego, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland, Fundacao Pio Xii Hosp Cancer De Barretos, Barretos, Brazil, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Oncology Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, Notre Dame University and Edith Cowan University, Murdoch, Australia, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs chemo and an acceptable safety profile in previously untreated, advanced non-HER2+ GC/GEJC/EAC, leading to approvals in many countries. NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy at 2 and 3-yr follow-ups. We present 4-yr follow-up results for NIVO + chemo vs chemo from CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. HER2+ patients (pts) were excluded. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At the 48-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table) OS benefit with NIVO + chemo was observed in most prespecified subgroups. Objective response rates (ORR) were higher and responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table). In the exploratory analysis of OS by response at the 18-week landmark timepoint, there were numerically more pts achieving response with NIVO + chemo vs chemo, and median OS (95% CI) with NIVO + chemo was numerically longer in responders vs non-responders both in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (20.5 [17.5–25.0] vs 14.0 [11.6–15.7]) and all randomized pts (19.4 [17.5–21.7] vs 13.1 [11.6–14.4]). No new safety signals were identified, consistent with the 3-yr follow-up. Conclusions: NIVO + chemo is the first PD-1 inhibitor/chemo combination to demonstrate long-term efficacy and acceptable safety after 4 yrs of follow up in previously untreated advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. These results are consistent with earlier follow-ups, further supporting NIVO + chemo as a standard 1L treatment in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.

EfficacyPD-L1 CPS ≥ 5All randomized
NIVO + chemo
(n = 473)
Chemo
(n = 482)
NIVO + chemo
(n = 789)
Chemo
(n = 792)
mOS (95% CI) mo14.4 (13.1–16.2)11.1 (10.1–12.1)13.7 (12.4–14.5)11.6 (10.9–12.5)
 HR (95% CI)0.70 (0.61–0.81)0.79 (0.71–0.88)
48-mo OS rate (95% CI) %17 (14–21)8 (6–11)13 (11–16)8 (6–10)
mPFSa (95% CI) mo8.3 (7.0–9.3)6.1 (5.6–6.9)7.7 (7.1–8.6)6.9 (6.7–7.2)
 HR (95% CI)0.71 (0.61–0.82)0.80 (0.71–0.89)
ORRa,b (95% CI) %60 (55–65)45 (40–50)58 (54–62)46 (42–50)
mDuration of responsea,c (95% CI) mo9.6 (8.3–12.4)7.0 (5.7–8.0)8.5 (7.7–9.9)6.9 (5.9–7.6)

aPer BICR.

bIn pts with measurable target lesions at baseline.

cIn responders.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02872116

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 306)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.306

Abstract #

306

Poster Bd #

E6

Abstract Disclosures