National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
Kohei Shitara , Markus H. Moehler , Jaffer A. Ajani , Lin Shen , Marcelo Garrido , Carlos Gallardo , Lucjan S. Wyrwicz , Kensei Yamaguchi , James M. Cleary , Elena Elimova , Ricardo Elias Bruges Maya , Michalis Karamouzis , Tomasz Skoczylas , Arinilda Bragagnoli , Tianshu Liu , Mustapha Tehfe , Kynan Feeney , Rui Wang , Raheel Nathani , Yelena Y. Janjigian
Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs chemo and an acceptable safety profile in previously untreated, advanced non-HER2+ GC/GEJC/EAC, leading to approvals in many countries. NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy at 2 and 3-yr follow-ups. We present 4-yr follow-up results for NIVO + chemo vs chemo from CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. HER2+ patients (pts) were excluded. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At the 48-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table) OS benefit with NIVO + chemo was observed in most prespecified subgroups. Objective response rates (ORR) were higher and responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table). In the exploratory analysis of OS by response at the 18-week landmark timepoint, there were numerically more pts achieving response with NIVO + chemo vs chemo, and median OS (95% CI) with NIVO + chemo was numerically longer in responders vs non-responders both in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (20.5 [17.5–25.0] vs 14.0 [11.6–15.7]) and all randomized pts (19.4 [17.5–21.7] vs 13.1 [11.6–14.4]). No new safety signals were identified, consistent with the 3-yr follow-up. Conclusions: NIVO + chemo is the first PD-1 inhibitor/chemo combination to demonstrate long-term efficacy and acceptable safety after 4 yrs of follow up in previously untreated advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. These results are consistent with earlier follow-ups, further supporting NIVO + chemo as a standard 1L treatment in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.
Efficacy | PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 | All randomized | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIVO + chemo (n = 473) | Chemo (n = 482) | NIVO + chemo (n = 789) | Chemo (n = 792) | |
mOS (95% CI) mo | 14.4 (13.1–16.2) | 11.1 (10.1–12.1) | 13.7 (12.4–14.5) | 11.6 (10.9–12.5) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.70 (0.61–0.81) | 0.79 (0.71–0.88) | ||
48-mo OS rate (95% CI) % | 17 (14–21) | 8 (6–11) | 13 (11–16) | 8 (6–10) |
mPFSa (95% CI) mo | 8.3 (7.0–9.3) | 6.1 (5.6–6.9) | 7.7 (7.1–8.6) | 6.9 (6.7–7.2) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.71 (0.61–0.82) | 0.80 (0.71–0.89) | ||
ORRa,b (95% CI) % | 60 (55–65) | 45 (40–50) | 58 (54–62) | 46 (42–50) |
mDuration of responsea,c (95% CI) mo | 9.6 (8.3–12.4) | 7.0 (5.7–8.0) | 8.5 (7.7–9.9) | 6.9 (5.9–7.6) |
aPer BICR.
bIn pts with measurable target lesions at baseline.
cIn responders.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Yelena Y. Janjigian
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Lin Shen
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Yelena Y. Janjigian
2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara