Nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): 3-year follow-up from CheckMate 649.

Authors

Yelena Janjigian

Yelena Y. Janjigian

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;

Yelena Y. Janjigian , Kohei Shitara , Markus H. Moehler , Marcelo Garrido , Carlos Gallardo , Lin Shen , Kensei Yamaguchi , Lucjan Wyrwicz , Tomasz Skoczylas , Arinilda Silva Campos Bragagnoli , Tianshu Liu , Mustapha Tehfe , Elena Elimova , Ricardo Elias Bruges Maya , James M. Cleary , Michalis Karamouzis , Samira Soleymani , Ming Lei , Carlos Amaya-Chanaga , Jaffer A. Ajani

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; , National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; , Johannes-Gutenberg University Clinic, Mainz, Germany; , Clinica San Carlos de Apoquindo, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, Chile; , Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez, Providencia, Chile; , Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China; , The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan; , Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii, Narodowy Instytut Onkologii, Warszawa, Poland; , II Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Gastroenterologicznej i Nowotworów Układu Pokarmowego, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland; , Fundacao Pio Xii Hosp Cancer De Barretos, Barretos, Brazil; , Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; , Oncology Center–Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada; , Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada; , Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia E.S.E., Bogotá, Colombia; , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; , Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece; , Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs chemo and an acceptable safety profile in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC, leading to approvals in multiple countries including the US. NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy after 2 years of follow-up. We present efficacy and safety analyses from NIVO + chemo vs chemo from the 3-year follow-up of CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Pts with known HER2-positive status were excluded. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 581 pts were concurrently randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. With 36-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts. The objective response rate (ORR) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 60% (95% CI 55–65) with NIVO + chemo vs 45% (95% CI 40–50) with chemo; in all randomized pts, ORR per BICR was 58% (95% CI 54–62) with NIVO + chemo vs 46% (95% CI 42–50) with chemo. Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (median [m] duration of response [mDOR] 9.6 mo [95% CI 8.2–12.4] vs 7.0 mo [95% CI 5.6–7.9], respectively) and in all randomized pts (mDOR 8.5 mo [95% CI 7.7–9.9] vs 6.9 mo [95% CI 5.8–7.2], respectively). OS benefit with NIVO + chemo was observed across most prespecified subgroups. No new safety signals were identified. A summary of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) is shown here. Conclusions: After 3 years of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful long-term survival benefit with an acceptable safety profile, further supporting its use as a standard 1L treatment in previously untreated pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.

EfficacyPD-L1 CPS ≥ 5All randomized
NIVO + chemo

(n = 473)
Chemo

(n = 482)
NIVO + chemo

(n = 789)
Chemo

(n = 792)
mOS (95% CI), mo14.4 (13.1–16.2)11.1 (10.0–12.1)13.7 (12.4–14.5)11.6 (10.9–12.5)
HR (95% CI)0.70 (0.61–0.81)0.79 (0.71–0.88)
mPFSa (95% CI), mo8.3 (7.0–9.3)6.1 (5.6–6.9)7.7 (7.1–8.6)6.9 (6.7–7.2)
HR (95% CI)0.70 (0.60–0.81)0.79 (0.71–0.89)
Safety, all treated pts, n (%)NIVO + chemo
(n = 782)
Chemo
(n = 767)
Any-grade TRAEs739 (95)682 (89)
Grade 3/4473 (60)346 (45)
Leading to discontinuation331 (42)198 (26)

aper BICR.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02872116

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 291)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.291

Abstract #

291

Abstract Disclosures