First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): CheckMate 649 Chinese subgroup analysis 4-year (yr) follow-up.

Authors

null

Lin Shen

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China

Lin Shen , Yuxian Bai , Xiaoyan Lin , Wei Li , Jufeng Wang , Xiaochun Zhang , Hongming Pan , Chunmei Bai , Li Bai , Ying Cheng , Jingdong Zhang , Haijun Zhong , Yi Ba , Wenwei Hu , Rui-Hua Xu , Weijian Guo , Shukui Qin , Rui Wang , Stephen McCraith , Tianshu Liu

Organizations

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China, Herbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, China, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China, China P.L.A. General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China, Medical Oncology Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, Eastern Theater General Hospital, Qinhuai District Medical Area, China, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) and an acceptable safety profile vs chemo in previously untreated Chinese pts from CheckMate 649, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. 1L NIVO + chemo is approved for advanced GC/GEJC/EAC in multiple countries, including China. We report 4-yr results of NIVO + chemo vs chemo in Chinese pts from CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic, non-HER2+ GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 208 Chinese pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At 49-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and in all randomized pts (Table). The 4-yr OS rate was 25% with NIVO + chemo vs 11% with chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and 21% vs 9% in all randomized pts. Objective response rate (ORR; 95% CI) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 68% (56–79) with NIVO + chemo vs 48% (36–60) with chemo; corresponding ORR in all randomized pts was 66% (55–76) and 45% (35–56). Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo both in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (median duration of response [mDOR; 95% CI] 12.5 mo [7.2–23.4] vs 6.9 mo [3.9–8.5]) and in all randomized pts (mDOR [95% CI] 12.5 mo [7.2–17.7] vs 5.6 mo [4.4–8.3]). No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: After 4 yrs of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit and more durable responses vs chemo in Chinese pts, with an acceptable safety profile. These results are consistent with previous reports and with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC and further support NIVO + chemo as a standard 1L treatment option for Chinese pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.

EfficacyPD-L1 CPS ≥ 5All Randomized
NIVO + chemo
(n = 75)
Chemo
(n = 81)
NIVO + chemo
(n = 99)
Chemo
(n = 109)
mOS (95% CI), mo15.5
(11.9–21.1)
9.6
(8.0–12.1)
14.3
(11.5–16.5)
10.3
(8.1–12.1)
 HR (95% CI)0.56 (0.39–0.80)0.62 (0.45–0.84)
mPFSa (95% CI), mo8.5
(6.0–14.0)
4.3
(4.1–6.5)
8.3
(6.2–12.4)
5.6
(4.2–6.8)
 HR (95% CI)0.51 (0.34–0.76)0.57 (0.41–0.80)
Safety, all treated pts: TRAEs, n (%)NIVO + chemo
(n = 99)
Chemo
(n = 106)
Any grade/grade 3–498 (99)/65 (66)100 (94)/53 (50)
Leading to discontinuation50 (51)/20 (20)28 (26)/11 (10)

aPer BICR. TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02872116

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 318)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.318

Abstract #

318

Poster Bd #

E18

Abstract Disclosures