Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): First results of the CheckMate 8HW study.

Authors

Thierry Andre

Thierry Andre

Sorbonne Université, and Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Thierry Andre , Elena Elez , Eric Van Cutsem , Lars Henrik Jensen , Jaafar Bennouna , Guillermo Mendez , Michael Schenker , Christelle De La Fouchardiere , Maria Luisa Limon , Takayuki Yoshino , Jin Li , Heinz-Josef Lenz , Jose Luis Manzano Mozo , Giampaolo Tortora , Rocio Garcia-Carbonero , Elvis Cela , Yingsi Yang , Ming Lei , Lixian Jin , Sara Lonardi

Organizations

Sorbonne Université, and Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Centrul de Oncologie Sf. Nectarie, Craiova, Romania, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon Cedex, France, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy

Research Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC have poor outcomes with standard chemo ± targeted therapies. NIVO ± IPI are approved in previously treated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC in many countries, based on the phase 2 CheckMate 142 study. CheckMate 8HW (NCT04008030) is a randomized phase 3 study comparing NIVO + IPI with NIVO or chemo in pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. We report progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) at a prespecified interim analysis for NIVO + IPI vs chemo in the 1L setting. Methods: Pts ≥ 18 years with recurrent or mCRC not amenable to surgery and MSI-H/dMMR status per local testing were enrolled across different lines of therapy. Previously untreated pts were randomized 2:2:1 to NIVO (240 mg) + IPI (1 mg/kg) Q3W (4 doses, then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), NIVO (240 mg) Q2W (6 doses, then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), or chemo ± targeted therapies; treatments continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (all arms), or a maximum of 2 years (NIVO ± IPI arms). For pts with BICR-documented progression with chemo, optional crossover to NIVO + IPI was permitted. Dual primary endpoints were PFS by BICR per RECIST v1.1 for NIVO + IPI vs chemo (1L) and NIVO + IPI vs NIVO (all lines) in pts with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Results: In the 1L setting, 303 pts were randomized to NIVO + IPI (n = 202) or chemo (n = 101); of these pts, 171 pts in the NIVO + IPI arm and 84 pts in the chemo arm had centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR result by either immunohistochemistry and/or polymerase chain reaction-based tests. With 24.3 months of median follow-up, NIVO + IPI demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS vs chemo, with a 79% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.21 [95% CI 0.14–0.32]; P< 0.0001) (Table). No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: NIVO + IPI demonstrated superior PFS vs chemo in previously untreated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. NIVO + IPI had a different safety profile compared to chemo, with fewer grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). These results support 1L NIVO + IPI as a standard-of-care option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04008030.

Efficacy (1L; Centrally Confirmed)NIVO + IPI
(n = 171)
Chemo
(n = 84)
Median PFS (95% CI), monthsNR (38.4–NE)5.8 (4.4–7.8)
HR (95% CI); P value0.21 (0.14–0.32); P< 0.0001
Safety (1L; All Treated), n (%)NIVO + IPI
(n = 200)
Chemo
(n = 88)
Any grade/grade 3–4 TRAEs160 (80)/46 (23)83 (94)/42 (48)
Any grade/grade 3–4 serious TRAEs38 (19)/32 (16)17 (19)/14 (16)
Any grade/grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation33 (17)/23 (12)28 (32)/9 (10)
Treatment-related deaths2 (1)0 (0)a

aOne death was reported during crossover treatment and deemed not related to chemo. NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid Oral Abstract Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04008030

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr LBA768)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.LBA768

Abstract #

LBA768

Abstract Disclosures