Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
Ian Chau , Yuichiro Doki , Jaffer A. Ajani , Jianming Xu , Lucjan Wyrwicz , Satoru Motoyama , Takashi Ogata , Hisato Kawakami , Chih-Hung Hsu , Antoine Adenis , Farid El Hajbi , Maria Di Bartolomeo , Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli , Eva Holtved , Ioannis Xynos , Xuan Liu , Ming Lei , Kaoru Kondo , Ken Kato , Yuko Kitagawa
Background: NIVO demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo in previously treated patients (pts) with ESCC (ATTRACTION-3). We report OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from CheckMate 648, the first global phase III study to evaluate both an immuno-oncology (I-O)/chemo combination and an I-O/I-O combination in advanced ESCC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC were enrolled regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression. Pts were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), or chemo alone. Primary endpoints for both comparisons were OS and PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Hierarchically tested secondary endpoints included OS and PFS in all randomized pts. Results: 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, and chemo arms (49% with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%). With 13 months (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI led to statistically significant improvement in OS vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts (Table). Statistically significant PFS benefit was also observed for NIVO + chemo vs chemo (HR 0.65 [98.5% CI 0.46–0.92]; P = 0.0023) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%. PFS in NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% did not meet the prespecified boundary for significance. The objective response rate (per BICR) was 53% (NIVO + chemo), 35% (NIVO + IPI), and 20% (chemo) in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and in all randomized pts was 47%, 28%, and 27%, respectively; longer median (95% CI) duration of response was observed vs chemo for pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%: 8.4 (6.9–12.4), 11.8 (7.1–27.4), and 5.7 (4.4–8.7) mo and for all randomized pts: 8.2 (6.9–9.7), 11.1 (8.3–14.0), and 7.1 (5.7–8.2) mo, respectively. No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: NIVO plus chemo and NIVO plus IPI both demonstrated superior OS vs chemo, along with durable objective responses and acceptable safety, in pts with advanced ESCC, and each represents a potential new 1L treatment option. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153
OS (tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%) | NIVO + chemo N = 158 | NIVO + IPI N = 158 | Chemo N = 157 |
---|---|---|---|
Median OS, mo (95% CI) | 15.4 (11.9–19.5) | 13.7 (11.2–17.0) | 9.1 (7.7–10.0) |
HR vs chemo (CI; P value) | 0.54 (99.5% CI 0.37–0.80; P< 0.0001) | 0.64 (98.6% CI 0.46–0.90; P = 0.001) | – |
OS (all randomized pts) | N = 321 | N = 325 | N = 324 |
Median OS, mo (95% CI) | 13.2 (11.1–15.7) | 12.8 (11.3–15.5) | 10.7 (9.4–11.9) |
HR vs chemo (CI; P value) | 0.74 (99.1% CI 0.58–0.96; P = 0.0021) | 0.78 (98.2% CI 0.62–0.98; P = 0.011) | – |
Safety: treatment-related events (all treated pts), n (%) | N = 310 | N = 322 | N = 304 |
Any grade/grade 3−4 | 297 (96)/147 (47) | 256 (80)/102 (32) | 275 (90)/108 (36) |
Leading to discontinuationa | 106 (34) | 57 (18) | 59 (19) |
Deaths | 5 (2) | 5 (2) | 4 (1) |
aDue to any component of the regimen.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ming Lei
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Yelena Y. Janjigian
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Yelena Y. Janjigian