Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) vs sunitinib (S) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Results from 55-month follow-up of the CheckMate 9ER trial.

Authors

Maria Bourlon de los Rios

Maria Teresa Bourlon

Urologic Oncology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, DF, Mexico

Maria Teresa Bourlon , Bernard Escudier , Mauricio Burotto , Thomas Powles , Andrea B. Apolo , Amishi Yogesh Shah , Camillo Porta , Cristina Suárez , Carlos H. Barrios , Martin Richardet , Howard Gurney , Elizabeth R. Kessler , Yoshihiko Tomita , Jens Bedke , Fong Wang , Peter Wang , Julie Panzica , Viktor Fedorov , Robert J. Motzer , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Urologic Oncology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, DF, Mexico, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile, Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Pesquisa em Oncologia, Hospital São Lucas, PUCRS, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Fundación Richardet Longo, Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina, Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Westmead and Sydney, NSW, Australia, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: N+C demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs S in patients (pts) with previously untreated aRCC in the primary analysis of the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial (18.1 mo median follow-up). N+C maintained efficacy benefits vs S with 44.0 mo median follow-up. Here, we report updated efficacy in intent-to-treat (ITT) pts and by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, and safety with extended follow-up. Methods: Pts with aRCC were randomized to N 240 mg every 2 weeks + C 40 mg QD vs S 50 mg QD (4 weeks of 6-week cycles) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with up to 2 y of N. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included OS, ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and safety. Results: Overall, 323 pts were randomized to N+C and 328 to S (ITT). With 55.6 mo median (48.1 mo min.) follow-up for OS, median PFS was 16.4 vs 8.4 mo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.70) and median OS was 46.5 vs 36.0 mo (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) with N+C vs S. ORR (95% CI) was 55.7% (50.1-61.2) vs 27.7% (23.0-32.9); 13.6% vs 4.6% of pts achieved complete response (CR); 6.5% vs 13.7% had progressive disease (PD), respectively. Median (range) time to response (TTR) was 2.8 (1.0-22.2) vs 4.3 (1.7-30.4) mo for N+C vs S, and median (95% CI) duration of response (DOR) was 22.0 (18.0-25.2) vs 15.2 (10.9-19.3) mo. Efficacy by IMDC favorable (FAV) and intermediate/poor (I/P) risk groups is reported in the Table. Among all treated pts (320 pts each arm), any-grade (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97.5% (67.5%) vs 93.1% (55.3%) with N+C vs S. Any-grade TRAEs led to discontinuation of N or C in 28.1% of pts (N only, 10.0%; C only, 10.3%; N+C simultaneously, 6.6%; N+C sequentially, 1.3%) and of S in 10.9% of pts. Additional analyses in subgroups of clinical interest will be presented. Conclusions: With 55.6 mo median follow-up, N+C continues to maintain meaningful long-term efficacy benefits over S. No new safety concerns were identified. These results continue to support N+C as a standard of care for previously untreated aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177.

FAV
N+C; n = 74
FAV
S; n = 72
I/P
N+C; n = 249
I/P
S; n = 256
mPFS (95% CI), mo21.4 (12.8–24.6)12.8 (9.4–16.6)15.4 (11.1–18.6)7.1 (5.7–8.9)
PFS HR (95% CI)0.69 (0.48–1.00)0.56 (0.45–0.68)
mOS (95% CI), mo52.9 (40.8–NE)58.9 (46.1–NE)43.9 (34.9–51.9)29.3 (23.7–36.2)
OS HR (95% CI)1.10 (0.69–1.75)0.73 (0.58–0.91)
ORR (95% CI), %66.2 (54.3–76.8)44.4 (32.7–56.6)52.6 (46.2–58.9)23.0 (18.0–28.7)
CR, %16.28.312.93.5
PD, %2.72.87.616.8
mTTR (range), moa2.8 (1.5–19.8)4.3 (1.7–30.4)2.8 (1.0–22.2)4.4 (1.7–18.1)
mDOR (95% CI), moa18.7 (13.9–22.2)17.8 (11.1–19.4)23.1 (17.3–30.5)13.8 (7.1–23.5)

aBased on pts with an objective response. m, median; NE, not estimable.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid Oral Abstract Session C: Renal Cell, Adrenal, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Testicular Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03141177

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 362)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.362

Abstract #

362

Abstract Disclosures