Nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): 3-year follow-up from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial.

Authors

null

Mauricio Burotto

Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile

Mauricio Burotto , Thomas Powles , Bernard Escudier , Andrea B. Apolo , Maria Teresa Bourlon , Amishi Yogesh Shah , Cristina Suárez , Camillo Porta , Carlos H. Barrios , Martin Richardet , Howard Gurney , Elizabeth R Kessler , Yoshihiko Tomita , Jens Bedke , Saby George , Christian Scheffold , Peter Wang , Viktor Fedorov , Robert J. Motzer , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile, Barts Cancer Centre, London, UK; The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, Centro de Pesquisa em Oncologia, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Fundación Richardet Longo, Instituto Oncologico de Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina, Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia, University of Colorado Cancer Center Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Exelixis, Inc, Alameda, CA, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: First-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) demonstrated superiority over sunitinib (S) with 25.4 mo minimum follow-up (median, 32.9 mo) in patients (pts) with aRCC in the CheckMate 9ER trial. Here, we report survival, response per blinded independent central review (BICR), and safety after 3 y minimum follow-up in all randomized pts and by IMDC risk score. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 (stratified by IMDC risk score, tumor PD-L1 expression, region) to N 240 mg flat dose IV Q2W + C 40 mg PO QD vs SUN 50 mg PO for 4 wk (6-wk cycles) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (max N treatment, 2 y). Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR. Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) by BICR, and safety. Results: In total, 323 pts were randomized to N+C and 328 to S. With 36.5 mo minimum follow-up (median, 44.0 mo), PFS and OS benefits were maintained with N+C vs S in intent-to-treat pts. Median PFS was 16.6 vs 8.4 mo (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.49–0.71], P< 0.0001) and median OS was 49.5 vs 35.5 mo (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56–0.87], P = 0.0014). ORR (95% CI) was higher with N+C vs S (56% [50–62] vs 28% [23–33]), and 13% vs 5% of pts achieved complete response (CR), respectively. Median duration of response was 22.1 vs 16.1 mo for N+C vs S. PFS, OS, and response are reported across prespecified IMDC risk groups in the table. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97% vs 93% of pts treated with N+C vs S (grade ≥ 3 TRAE, 67% vs 55%). TRAEs led to discontinuation of C only in 10% of pts, N only in 10% of pts, N+C in 7% of pts, N or C in 28% of pts, and S in 11% of pts. Conclusions: After 3 y minimum follow-up, survival and response benefits were maintained with N+C and remained consistent with previous follow-ups. Median OS with N+C improved by 11.8 mo since the previous data cut. Responses with N+C were durable, with higher CR rates with N+C vs S regardless of IMDC risk group. No new safety signals emerged with additional follow-up in either arm. These results continue to support N+C as a first-line treatment for pts with aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177.

FAV
N+C; n = 74
FAV
S; n = 72
INT
N+C; n = 188
INT
S; n = 188
Poor
N+C; n = 61
Poor
S; n = 68
I/P
N+C; n = 249
I/P
S; n = 256
mPFS (95% CI), mo21.4
(13.1–24.7)
13.9
(9.6–16.7)
16.6
(11.9–20.0)
8.7
(7.0–10.4)
9.9
(5.9–17.7)
4.2
(2.9–5.6)
15.6
(11.2–19.2)
7.1
(5.7–8.9)
PFS HR (95% CI)0.72
(0.49–1.05)
0.63
(0.49–0.80)
0.37
(0.24–0.57)
0.56
(0.46–0.69)
mOS (95% CI), moNR
(40.7-NE)
47.6
(43.6-NE)
49.5
(37.6–NE)
36.2
(25.7–46.0)
34.8
(21.4–NE)
10.5
(6.8–20.7)
49.5
(34.9–NE)
29.2
(23.7–36.0)
OS HR (95% CI)1.07
(0.63–1.79)
0.75
(0.56–1.0)
0.46
(0.30–0.72)
0.65
(0.51–0.83)
ORR (95% CI), %68
(56–78)
46
(34–58)
56
(49–64)
28
(21–35)
41
(29–54)
10
(4–20)
53
(46–59)
23
(18–29)
CR, %161015451124

FAV, favorable; INT, intermediate; I/P, intermediate/poor; m, median; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session C: Renal and Rare Tumors

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03141177

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 603)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.603

Abstract #

603

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts