Final overall survival analysis and organ-specific target lesion assessments with two-year follow-up in CheckMate 9ER: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors

null

Thomas Powles

Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

Thomas Powles , Toni K. Choueiri , Mauricio Burotto , Bernard Escudier , Maria Teresa Bourlon , Amishi Yogesh Shah , Cristina Suárez , Alketa Hamzaj , Camillo Porta , Christopher Hocking , Elizabeth R Kessler , Howard Gurney , Yoshihiko Tomita , Jens Bedke , Joshua Zhang , Burcin Simsek , Christian Scheffold , Andrea B. Apolo , Robert J. Motzer

Organizations

Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Urologic Oncology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, DF, Mexico, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Vall d´Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, Ospedale San Donato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Arezzo, Italy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA, Australia, University of Colorado Cancer Center Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Eberhand Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: First-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) demonstrated superiority over sunitinib (SUN) in the primary disclosure of the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial (NCT03141177; 10.6 months minimum follow-up; Choueiri TK et al. N Engl J Med 2021) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Here, we report the preplanned final overall survival (OS) analysis with updated efficacy and safety in intent-to-treat (ITT) pts, and an exploratory assessment of target lesions by organ site after extended follow-up. Methods: Pts with aRCC (clear cell component) were randomized to N 240 mg every 2 weeks + C 40 mg once daily vs SUN 50 mg once daily (4 weeks of 6-week cycles). The primary endpoint was RECIST v1.1–defined progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in ITT pts; secondary endpoints included OS, objective response rate (ORR) by BICR, and safety. The preplanned final OS analysis was set to occur after observing 254 events. Maximal reduction of target lung, lymph node, kidney, and liver lesions were evaluated per BICR via post hoc exploratory analyses. Results: After 25.4 months minimum follow-up (median, 32.9 months) for OS in ITT pts, a total of 271 OS events occurred, and N+C continued to demonstrate OS improvement vs SUN (N = 323 vs 328; median 37.7 vs 34.3 months; HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.55–0.90]). PFS (median 16.6 vs 8.3 months; HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.46–0.68]) and ORR (55.7% [95% CI 50.1–61.2] vs 28.4% [95% CI 23.5–33.6]) benefits were maintained with N+C vs SUN, and 12.4% (N+C) vs 5.2% (SUN) of pts had a complete response. Median duration of response was 23.1 months with N+C vs 15.1 months with SUN. A higher percentage of pts experienced any reduction and ≥30% reduction from baseline with N+C vs SUN in target lesions at all organ sites assessed (Table). Among all treated pts, 97.2% (N+C; N = 320) vs 93.1% (SUN; N = 320) had a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade (65.0% vs 54.1% had a grade ≥ 3 TRAE). Conclusions: N+C continued to provide survival improvement vs SUN among ITT pts in the final OS analysis, additionally PFS and ORR benefits with N+C were sustained with minimum 2-year follow-up. A higher proportion of pts experienced tumor shrinkage benefit with N+C vs SUN across all 4 organ sites assessed. No new safety signals emerged with extended follow-up in either arm. These results highlight N+C as a first-line treatment for pts with aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177.

TL organ site
Lung
Lymph node
Kidney
Liver
Arm; n
N+C;

158
SUN;

183
N+C;

121
SUN;

113
N+C;

73
SUN;

74
N+C;

44
SUN;

39
Median sum of diameters of TLs by organ site at BL, mm
29
32
38
35
92
93
55
65
Reduction from BL in sum of diameter of organ-specific TLs

Pts with any reduction, %

Pts with ≥ 30% reduction, %


91

76


76

46


88

74


73

48


89

45


72

30


73

48


54

33

BL, baseline; TL, target lesion.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03141177

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 350)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.350

Abstract #

350

Poster Bd #

F12

Abstract Disclosures