Nivolumab + cabozantinib (NIVO+CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Outcomes by sarcomatoid histology and updated trial results with extended follow-up of CheckMate 9ER.

Authors

null

Robert J. Motzer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Robert J. Motzer , Toni K. Choueiri , Thomas Powles , Mauricio Burotto , Maria Teresa Bourlon , James J Hsieh , Marco Maruzzo , Amishi Yogesh Shah , Cristina Suarez , Carlos H. Barrios , Martin Eduardo Richardet , Camillo Porta , Jeffrey C. Goh , Yoshihiko Tomita , Jens Bedke , Joshua Zhang , Burcin Simsek , Christian Scheffold , Saurabh Gupta , Andrea B. Apolo

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile, Urologic Oncology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, DF, Mexico, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Vall d´Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital São Lucas, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Fundacion Richardet Longo, Instituto Oncologico de Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina, University of Bari ‘A. Moro’, Bari, Italy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston and University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Eberhand Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb.

Background: First-line NIVO+CABO met primary and secondary efficacy endpoints by improving progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.51, P< 0.0001), overall survival (OS; HR 0.60, P = 0.0010), and objective response rate (ORR; 55.7% vs 27.1%; P< 0.0001) vs SUN in patients (pts) with aRCC in CheckMate 9ER (Choueiri et al. ESMO 2020). Efficacy benefits with NIVO+CABO vs SUN were consistent across prespecified subgroups including by IMDC risk group, and regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression (database lock for primary analysis, March 30, 2020). Updated analyses are needed to establish durability of benefit with first-line NIVO+CABO and assess outcomes in aRCC pts with sarcomatoid features (sRCC)—an aggressive histologic subtype associated with poor prognoses. Methods: In this phase III open-label trial, adults with confirmed aRCC (with a clear cell component including those with sRCC) were randomized 1:1 (stratified by IMDC risk score, tumor PD-L1 expression, geographic region) to NIVO 240 mg IV Q2W + CABO 40 mg PO QD vs SUN 50 mg PO (4 weeks of 6-week cycles). The primary endpoint was RECIST v1.1-defined PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in all randomized (intent-to-treat [ITT]) pts; secondary endpoints included OS, ORR by BICR, and safety. Pts with and without sRCC were identified by local pathology report, and outcomes in these pts were evaluated via prespecified supportive subset analyses. Results: The presence of sRCC was assessed in ITT pts (N = 651) at enrollment. Overall, 75 (11.5%) pts had sRCC and 557 (85.6%) did not; sRCC status was not reported in 19 pts (2.9%). Overall, 34 vs 41 pts with sRCC were randomized to NIVO+CABO vs SUN, respectively. At a median follow-up of 18.1 months, NIVO+CABO improved PFS, OS, and ORR in sRCC pts vs SUN (Table). Notable PFS, OS, and ORR benefits were observed with NIVO+CABO vs SUN in the subgroup of pts without sRCC. Median PFS was doubled, the risk of death was lower, and ORR was consistently higher with NIVO+CABO vs SUN regardless of sarcomatoid status. Key updated PFS, OS, response, and safety outcomes in the ITT population and in pts with and without sRCC will be reported with additional follow-up based on a September 10, 2020 database lock. Conclusions: NIVO+CABO demonstrated improved efficacy and prolonged survival vs SUN in previously untreated aRCC pts regardless of sarcomatoid status. Updated results with extended follow-up will assess the durability of outcomes in this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177.

With sRCC
Without sRCCa
NIVO+CABO
n = 34
SUN
n = 41
NIVO+CABO
n = 279
SUN
n = 278
PFS HR (95% CI)0.39 (0.22–0.70)0.54 (0.43–0.69)
Median PFS, months10.94.217.79.4
OS HR (95% CI)0.36 (0.16–0.82)0.68 ( 0.48–0.95)
Median OS, monthsNR19.7NRNR
ORR, % (95% CI)55.9 (37.9–72.8)22.0 (10.6–37.6)56.6 (50.6–62.5)28.4 (23.2–34.1)

aPts assessed for sRCC and were negative.

NR, not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03141177

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 308)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.308

Abstract #

308

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts