Exploratory evaluation of baseline tumor biomarkers and their association with response and survival in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer treated with andecaliximab combined with nivolumab versus nivolumab.

Authors

null

Jean-Philippe Metges

Oncology & Haematology Institute, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France

Jean-Philippe Metges , Emon Elboudwarej , David Cunningham , Daniel V.T. Catenacci , Eric Van Cutsem , Zev A. Wainberg , Yafeng Zhang , Scott Turner , Dung Thai , Pankaj Bhargava , Manish A. Shah , Carrie Brachmann

Organizations

Oncology & Haematology Institute, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom, University of Chicago Medical Center and Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, University Hospitals and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, Weill Cornell Medicine/ New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Andecaliximab (ADX) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9). Preclinical studies suggest that MMP9 inhibition relieves immune suppression and promotes T cell infiltration to potentiate checkpoint blockade. In the phase 2 study combining ADX with nivolumab (N) versus N monotherapy (NCT02864381), addition of ADX to N did not improve objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS). Methods: Archival tumor samples were collected from all patients (n = 141). CD8 and PD-L1 (28-8 DAKO) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. CD8+ cell density was measured in the tumor area. PD-L1 was prospectively scored by a pathologist for tumor cell (TC) and associated immune cell (IC) positivity. IFNg, Teffector (Teff), and activated CD8+ T cell (ActT) gene signatures were assessed by RNA sequencing. Due to a small number of responders, treatment arms were combined to evaluate response. Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analyses. Nominal p-values are reported. Results: Baseline biomarkers of T cell infiltration and activation did not differentiate responders from non-responders (IFNg, Teff, ActT, CD8+; p > .10). None of the evaluated biomarkers were associated with PFS or OS for all treated patients or per treatment arm (IFNg, Teff, ActT; p > .10), with the exception of CD8+ (PFS HR = .43, p = .02). The majority of baseline samples were positive for IC PD-L1 (< 1%, n = 36; 1-10%, n = 50; > 10-25%, n = 32; > 25%, n = 20) and negative for TC PD-L1 (H = 0, n = 88; H < 1, n = 27; H > 1; n = 27). Comparing ADX/N to N, there was a trend toward longer OS for the PD-L1+ (TC + IC ≥ 1%) population (n = 102, HR = .621, p = .098), the TC H < 1 group (HR = .464, p = .08) and the IC > 10-25% (HR = .466, p = .08). Conclusions: Neither CD8+ cell density nor IFNg, Teff or ActT gene signatures were associated with response or survival to checkpoint blockade. While TC was low, IC intermediate and TC + IC ≥ 1% PD-L1+ groups trended toward better survival for the ADX+N arm, consistent with the hypothesis that ADX potentiates N activity; this did not translate into better outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02864381

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02864381

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 4; abstr 148)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.148

Abstract #

148

Poster Bd #

L20

Abstract Disclosures