Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
Yu Sunakawa , Xuemin Fang , Masahito Kotaka , Hiroaki Tanioka , Akinori Takagane , Satoshi Tani , Tatsuro Yamaguchi , Takanori Watanabe , Toshiki Masuishi , Masahiro Tsuda , Tatsuya Okuno , Takao Tamura , Kaoru Furushima , Hidekazu Kuramochi , Junichi Koike , Yutaka Yonemura , Hisateru Yasui , Masahiro Takeuchi , Masashi Fujii , Wataru Ichikawa
Background: We have reported that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response correlated with clinical outcomes of 1st-line cet-based therapy (Target Oncol 2017). Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is considered to be an on-treatment biomarker for outcomes of chemotherapy; however, clinical biomarkers to predict outcomes earlier are warranted. Methods: This study included 69 pts who were assessable for CEA at baseline and 4 wks, and with observed survival time from 2 phase II trials of 1st-line therapy for KRAS exon2 wild-type mCRC; JACCRO CC-05 of cet plus FOLFOX (UMIN000004197) and CC-06 of cet plus SOX (UMIN000007022). We investigated the influence of baseline age, gender, PS, primary tumor sidedness (PTS), number of tumor sites, as well as the CEA decrease at 4 wks to the patient’s OS and PFS. Results: PTS and the CEA decrease at 4 wks were found to be important predictors to OS and PFS. Baseline CEA and CEA decrease at 4 wks were median of 31.0 (range, 1.0-20920.0) and median of 35% (range, -259%-97%), respectively. The STEP-analysis indicated that CEA response was most significantly associated with OS when a cut-off value of 50% for CEA-responder (HR 0.49, log-rank test p = 0.03). Median OS in responders (n = 25) and non-responders (n = 44) were 36.2 m and 21.5 m, respectively. When the same cut-off value was used, median PFS in responders and non-responders were 11.6 m and 6.5 m, respectively (HR 0.64, log-rank test p = 0.08). In addition, a multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazards Model with both PTS and CEA response as risk factors showed that PTS correlated with both OS and PFS. In pts with left-sided tumors, non-responders (n = 33) had shorter OS and PFS compared to responders (n = 23). In the above 2-covariate Cox proportional hazard model, adjusted HR for CEA 50% decrease is 0.55, p = 0.1; adjusted HR for PTS is 2.66, p = 0.008. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests 50% CEA decrease at 4 wks as an early on-treatment biomarker for 1st-line cet-based therapy in mCRC. It may potentially predict outcomes earlier compared to ETS. Also, CEA response at 4 wks may differentiate pts who receive more benefit from cet treatment in left-sided tumors. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004197 and UMIN000007022.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Julian Walter Holch
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Thierry Andre
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Lin Shen