A randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for early breast cancer: Three-year follow-up data.

Authors

null

Andreas Schneeweiss

University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Andreas Schneeweiss , Amparo Ruiz , Alexey Manikhas , Alberto Bottini , Pedro Sanchez Rovira , Kambiz Mansouri , Gbenga Kazeem , Thomas Bauknecht

Organizations

University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain, City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia, U.O. Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, A.O. Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaen, Spain, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany, Lilly United Kingdom, Surrey, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: NACT for early breast cancer allows in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Primary results of this randomized, non-comparative 2-arm study have been published (Schneeweiss et al, Ann Oncol 2011). Here we provide 3-year follow-up data for disease-free survival (DFS) and safety. Methods: 257 patients (pts) with untreated operable T2–T4a–c N0–2 M0 breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m² plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks (q3w) followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m² q3w (AP-D; 135 pts), or four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m² plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² q3w followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m² q3w (AC-D; 122 pts). Both arms were stratified according to hormone receptor (HR) status (estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive vs both negative) and study center. Surgery was carried out within 2 months after last chemotherapy. Primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast (ypT0/is). Secondary objectives included long-term efficacy and safety measures. DFS and adverse event data were collected from all patients for 3 years or until progression or death. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis technique and Cox regression method were used as statistical measures. KM analyses were performed on HR-positive and -negative pts subgroups. Results: As reported earlier, pCR rates were 16.5% for AP-D and 20.2% for AC-D. The 3-year DFS rate was 76% and 77% for AP-D and AC-D, respectively. Cox regression analysis for the overall enrolled population (regardless of treatment) revealed significantly longer DFS in HR-positive than in HR-negative pts (hazard ratio 0.35; 95% CI 0.22–0.58; p < 0.001). In HR-positive pts, the 3-year DFS rate was 88% (95% CI: 81–95%) with AP-D and 83% (95% CI: 74–91%) with AC-D. In HR-negative pts, the 3-year DFS rate was 55% (95% CI: 40–70%) for AP-D and 68% (95% CI: 53–82%) for AC-D. The 3-year follow-up data did not reveal any changes in the safety profile compared to the previously published results. Conclusions: The 3-year DFS rates of both NACTs are in line with published studies.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00149214

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 1059)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1059

Abstract #

1059

Poster Bd #

22B

Abstract Disclosures