Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers.

Authors

null

Sara P. Myers

Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Sara P. Myers , Varadan Sevilimedu , Andrea Veronica Barrio , Audree Tadros , Anita Mamtani , Mark E. Robson , Monica Morrow , Minna Lee

Organizations

Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Distinct pathological characteristics and mutational signatures in BRCA-associated breast cancers may result in differential response to chemotherapy but understanding of treatment response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is limited. We describe a single-institutional experience to compare rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC in BRCA carriers (gBRCA1/2) and noncarriers. Methods: From 11/2013 to 01/2022, 1426 consecutive women with clinical stage I-III breast cancer were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Baseline disease characteristics were compared between gBRCA1/2 and noncarriers using two-sample non-parametric tests. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between BRCA status and pCR (i.e., ypT0/is pN0) adjusting for variables selected using backward elimination. Results: 92 (6.5%) and 73 (5.1%) had deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Compared to noncarriers, gBRCA1/2 were younger (p<0.001) with clinical T1 (p=0.002) and triple negative disease (TN) (57% vs 25% noncarriers, p<0.001). Almost all patients received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/paclitaxel therapy (93%) with gBRCA1/2 more likely to receive carboplatin (p<0.001). pCR rate was 42% of gBRCA1, 21% of gBRCA2, and 26% of noncarriers (p=0.001). Among clinically node positive (cN+) patients, nodal pCR was higher in gBRCA1/2 compared to noncarriers (53/96 (55%) vs 371/856 (43%), p=0.012). This difference was seen in ER+/HER2- (36% gBRCA1/2 vs 20% noncarriers; p=0.027) and TN subtypes (79% gBRCA1/2 vs 45% noncarriers; p<0.001). Poorly differentiated tumors (p<0.001), cN+ (p=0.010), lower cT stage (p=0.028), ductal histology (p<0.001), TN and HER2+ receptor status (p<0.001), absence of lymphovascular invasion (p<0.001), carboplatin receipt (p=0.041), and BRCA1 status (p=0.001) were also associated with pCR on univariate analysis. After adjusting for differentiation and molecular subtype, BRCA1 status remained independently associated with pCR. Conclusions: gBRCA1 undergoing NAC have higher pCR rates relative to gBRCA2 and patients with sporadic disease. Across breast cancer subtypes, gBRCA1/2 more frequently converted to pN0. Defining biological mechanism for these findings would allow customization of treatment based on germline genetics.

Multivariable model for pathologic complete response.

CharacteristicOdds ratio (95% CI)p-value
BRCA status*
BRCA12.40 (1.47, 3.89)<0.001
BRCA21.10 (0.55, 2.06)0.8
Well/moderately differentiated0.30 (0.20, 0.44)<0.001
Molecular subtype§
TNBC3.75 (2.53, 5.68)<0.001
HR+ HER2+4.77 (3.17, 7.31)
HR- HER2+16.3 (10.3, 26.1)

Abbreviations: CI= confidence interval; IQR= interquartile range; HR= hormone receptor; HER2= human epidermal growth factor 2.

* Relative to noncarrier. † Relative to poorly differentiated. § Relative to HR+ HER2-.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 544)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.544

Abstract #

544

Poster Bd #

374

Abstract Disclosures