Omega Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
Badiginchala Revathi , Palanki Satya Dattatreya , Attili Venkata Satya Suresh , Sharanabasappa Somanath Nirni , Vindhya Vasini Andra
Background: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) was developed to overcome toxicity issues associated with conventional docetaxel. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of NDLS versus conventional docetaxel-based neo/adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Methods: Patients with stage IIb-III breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by conventional docetaxel (arm A) or NDLS (Doceaqualip; arm B) at a dose 75 mg/m2 IV every 3-weekly for 4 cycles as neo/adjuvant therapy. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer received treatment as per clinical practice. The study outcomes included pathologic and clinical response rates (pCR, CR), and overall survival (OS). Results: 60 patients were randomized to arm A (n=30) or arm B (n=30). The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The pathological and clinical response rates were comparable between the NDLS and conventional docetaxel arms (P>0.05) (Table). The efficacy outcomes were not affected by the receptor (estrogen, progesterone, and HER2) status. The pCR and CR rates were higher in patients who received neoadjuvant AC followed by neoadjuvant NDLS/T versus neoadjuvant AC followed by adjuvant NDLS/T. At a follow-up of 6 months, median OS was not evaluable in both arms as all patients were alive at follow-up post study completion. Grade 3/4 infusion-related reactions, hyperglycemia and neuropathy were noted in 5, 8 and 3 patients, respectively, in the conventional docetaxel arm while it was not reported in any patient in the NDLS arm. Conclusions: NDLS based neo/adjuvant chemotherapy was efficacious in the treatment of breast cancer and showed comparable pCR, CR and OS rates versus conventional docetaxel. NDLS was better tolerated than conventional docetaxel.
Arm A (N=30)* | Arm B (N=30)* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response rates | Neoadjuvant AC-T (n=10) | Neoadjuvant AC-Adjuvant T (n=15) | Neoadjuvant AC-NDLS (n=9) | Neoadjuvant AC-Adjuvant NDLS (n=14) | |
Pathological response | pCR | 10/10 (100%) | 8/15 (53.33%) | 9/9 (100%) | 10/14 (71.43%) |
pCR by receptor status | ER+/HER2− | 1/1 (100%) | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
ER+/HER2+ | 8/8 (100%) | 5/11 (45.45%) | 4/4 (100%) | 7/11 (63.64%) | |
ER−/HER2− | 1/1 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 5/5 (100%) | 3/3 (100%) | |
Clinical response | CR | 10/10 (100%) | 13/15 (86.67%) | 8/9 (88.89%) | 14/14 (100%) |
PD | 0/0 | 2/15 (13.33%) | 1/9 (11.11%) | 0/0 |
AC, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; CR, complete response; NDLS, nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension; pCR, pathologic complete response; PD, progressive disease; T, docetaxel. P=not significant for all comparisons. *In arm A, 5 patients received adjuvant AC followed by docetaxel; in arm B, 7 patients received adjuvant AC followed by NDLS.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Kay T Yeung
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Anant Ramaswamy
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tarek Mohamed Ahmed Abdel-Fatah