Clinical significance of tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy.

Authors

null

J. Jo

Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

J. Jo , M. Ryu , D. Koo , B. Ryoo , H. J. Kim , J. Lee , H. Chang , T. W. Kim , K. D. Choi , G. H. Lee , H. Jung , K. C. Kim , J. H. Yook , S. T. Oh , B. S. Kim , J. Kim , Y. Kang

Organizations

Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Although tumor markers are known to be associated with tumor burden and/or aggressive biology, any association of such markers with patient survival has not previously been determined in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Methods: Of 3,107 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer who initiated palliative chemotherapy in Asan Medical Center between January 2000 and December 2008, 1,178 were assayed for expression of three serum tumor markers, CA 19-9, CA 72-4, and CEA, prior to initiation of first-line chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the relationships between tumor marker concentrations and clinicopathologic features, and treatment outcomes in such patients. Results: Elevated serum concentrations of CA 19-9 (>37 U/mL), CA 72-4 (>4 U/mL), or CEA (>6 ng/mL) were observed in 38.1%, 56.2%, and 33.1% of patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that serum positivity of all the 3 markers, CA 19-9 (p=0.001), CA 72-4 (p=0.001), and CEA (p=0.030) were associated with poor survival. However, upon multivariate analysis, only CA19-9 (HR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37, p<0.001) was independently associated with poor survival outcome, in addition to the following clinical factors determined in previous study for gastric cancer prognostic model (Koo, et al): ECOG PS ≥ 2, no previous gastrectomy , peritoneal metastasis, bone metastasis , lung metastasis, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 120 IU/L, serum albumin < 3.3 g/dL, and total serum bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL. In good risk group by the prognostic model, survival difference in the positivity of CA 19-9 was more significant (p < 0.001), while serum positivity of CA 19-9 did not provide clinical significance for moderate and poor groups. Conclusions: The postivitiy of serum CA 19-9 for patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer at the time of first line chemotherapy, especially in good prognostic group is an independent negative prognostic factor.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal, Gastric, or Small Bowel

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 4035)

Abstract #

4035

Poster Bd #

23C

Abstract Disclosures