The association between minimal residual disease status and survival outcomes in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TIE-NDMM) patients: Systematic review.

Authors

null

Zunairah Shah

Louis A Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL

Zunairah Shah , Israr Khan , Insija Ilyas Selene , Syed Hamza Bin Waqar , Razwana Khanam , Qurrat-ul-ain Abid , Nayha Tahir , Sanjivani Sathe , Babray Laek , Asmi Chattaraj , Zinath Roksana , Irisha Badu , Faiz Anwer

Organizations

Louis A Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, FL, Central Michigan University, Saginaw, MI, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Mckeesport, PA, AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Northwestern Hospital McHenry, Chicago, IL, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, UPMC McKeesport, Pittsburg, PA, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Mckeesport, PA, Medical Officer, feni-3900, Feni, Bangladesh, Onslow Memorial Hospital, Jacksonville, NC, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Despite expanding therapeutic armamentarium of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Therefore, there is a need to assess the impact of deeper hematological responses to better gauge treatments in clinical trials and routine practice. The presence of minimal residual disease (MRD), is becoming crucial and a new standard in monitoring remission status. Clinical evidence shows that MRD status after treatment is an independent prognostic factor for MM. This review summarizes current data on MRD status and its role in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Methods: We performed a literature search on four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We screened 1307 studies using the Mesh terms “Multiple Myeloma and Minimal Residual disease.” After excluding review, duplicate, and non-relevant articles, 7 studies were included. Results: The association between MRD status and outcomes, including survival in TIE-NDMM patients was assessed in 7 studies, including 1083 patients. MRD status was determined using different techniques, such as flow cytometry and clonoSEQ. Different regimens were used in all studies. PFS was reported in all studies. Compared with MRD positive status, achieving MRD negativity improved PFS to 58 months versus 28.65 months as per cumulative analysis. The cumulative OS reported in 2 studies (n=196) was 95.85% in MRD-negative patients compared to 55.65% in MRD positive patients. Conclusions: Further clinical data focusing on post-treatment assessment of MRD will be useful in clinical decision-making and could be practice changing. MRD status may serve as surrogate end-points for PFS and OS in ongoing and future clinical trials. Achieving durable MRD negativity with PFS improvement might also increase the time between treatment relapses for MM and might help switch to a lesser aggressive regimen, chemotherapy-free period, avoiding drug toxicity.

MRD status and anti-myeloma therapy related outcomes.

Author, year
No of patients (n)
PFS (months) in MRD +ve
PFS (months) in MRD -ve
OS (months)

MRD +ve
OS (months)

MRD +ve
Sanchez-Vega, 2016
n=110
3281
50
median NR
Bahlis, 2019
n=737
31.9
NR
NA
NA
Facon, 2019
n=955

MRD assessed: n= 327
2-year PFS: 79%
2-year PFS: 83%
NA
NA
Li et al, 2019
n=12326
NR
66.3%
91.7%
Martinez, 2017
n=73
35
NR
3-year OS rate: 45% median OS= 503-year OS rate: 100%

median OS= NR
Mateos, 2014
n=260

MRD assessed: n=153
29
59
median OS= NR


median OS= 50


Mary de Tute, 2016
n=297
18
34
NA
NA

NR: Not reached, NA=Not available, PFS: Progression free survival, OS: Overall survival, MRD: Minimal residual disease

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e20009)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e20009

Abstract #

e20009

Abstract Disclosures