Increasing utilization of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors

null

Avinash Maganty

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA

Avinash Maganty , Michelle Yu , Liam C Macleod , Jonathan G Yabes , Mina M Fam , Jathin Bandari , Robert Turner , Alessandro Furlan , Christopher Paul Filson , Benjamin John Davies , Bruce Lee Jacobs

Organizations

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Emory University School of Medicine/Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, Univ of Pittsburgh Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Multi-parametric resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as a tool that may improve risk-stratification and decrease repeated biopsies in men electing active surveillance. However, the extent to which mpMRI has been implemented in active surveillance has not been established. Therefore, we sought to characterize the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in Medicare beneficiaries electing active surveillance for prostate cancer. Methods: SEER-Medicare claims data, we identified men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 2008-2013 and managed with active surveillance. We classified men into two treatment groups: active surveillance without mpMRI and active surveillance with mpMRI. We then fit a multivariable logistic regression models to examine changing mpMRI utilization over time, and factors associated with the receipt of mpMRI. Results: We identified 9,467 men on active surveillance. Of these, 8,178 (86%) did not receive mpMRI and 1,289 (14%) received mpMRI. The likelihood of receiving mpMRI over the entire study period increased by 3.7% (p = 0.004). On multivariable logistic regression, patients who were younger, white, had lower comorbidity burden, lived in the northeast and west, had higher incomes and lived in more urban areas had greater odds of receiving mpMRI (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: From 2008-2013, use of mpMRI in active surveillance increased gradually but significantly. Receipt of mpMRI among men on surveillance for prostate cancer varied significantly across demographic, geographic and socioeconomic strata. Going forward, studies should investigate causes for this variation and define ideal strategies for equitable, cost-effective dissemination of mpMRI technology.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 125)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.125

Abstract #

125

Poster Bd #

C7

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Partial gland ablation outcomes for localized prostate cancer in patients with MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions.

First Author: Alec Zhu

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

“It just makes sense to me”: Patient experiences with prostate MRI during prostate cancer active surveillance.

First Author: Ryan Sutherland

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial differences in the utilization of MRI-guided biopsy before prostate cancer diagnosis.

First Author: Grace L. Lu-Yao