Partial gland ablation outcomes for localized prostate cancer in patients with MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions.

Authors

null

Alec Zhu

Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Alec Zhu , Sofia Gereta , Judith Stangl-Kremser , Daniel Margolis , Leonardo Daniel Borregales , Spyridon P. Basourakos , Timothy D McClure , Jim C. Hu

Organizations

Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Weill Cornell Imaging at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, TX, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Weil Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Partial gland ablation (PGA) for MRI-invisible prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial, and we compared treatment failure rates, adverse events, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes (HRQoL) following PGA in subjects with MRI-visible vs. MRI-invisible lesions. Methods: Retrospective review was done of primary PGA therapy (cryoablation, irreversible electroporation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound) performed between January 2017 and 2022 at Weill Cornell Medical Center. Analysis was restricted to men with at least one post-PGA prostate biopsy. Men with PCa on systematic biopsy outside of the MRI-targeted zone were categorized as having MRI-invisible lesions. Failure of PGA was defined as persistence or recurrence of Gleason grade group (GGG) ≥2 on surveillance biopsy for subjects diagnosed with GGG ≥2 PCa. For patients treated for GGG 1 PCa, failure was defined by the detection of GGG ≥1 PCa. Adverse events were captured by the Clavien-Dindo classification and HRQoL outcomes were captured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP). Groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared test and the 2-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Results: Out of 115 men were treated for primary prostate cancer, 89 men had at least one surveillance biopsy performed, and 87 men had available pre-treatment MRI data. Out 79 subjects treated with MRI-visible lesions and 34 subjects treated with MRI-invisible lesions, 59 and 28 subjects, respectively, had surveillance biopsy data. Median (IQR) follow-up was 15.5 months (7.7-25.5) in the overall cohort; median follow-up was not significantly different between the MRI-visible and MRI-invisible groups (15 vs. 15 months, p-value=0.766). Failure of PGA occurred in 43 (48.3%) of total subjects. Failure of PGA was not significantly different between the MRI-visible and MRI-invisible groups (50.9% vs. 42.9%, p-value=0.502). Mean total EPIC-CP scores were not significantly different between both groups at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after PGA. Additionally, rates of 30-day complications were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: Failure is evident in almost half of patients treated with PGA therapy. Oncologic and functional treatment outcomes after focal therapy are similar between patients with MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions.

Overall n=89MR-visible lesions n=59MR-invisible lesions n=28p-value
Median age (IQR)70.7 (63.4-74.3)71.7 (63.9-75.8)64.7 (60.2-72.4)0.005
Median PSA, ng/mL (IQR)6.4 (4.8-8.5)6.4 (4.8-8.9)6(4.7-8)0.494
Median MRI volume, cc (IQR)46.4 (34-63)45.5 (33.9-63)48(35.3-65)0.769
Gleason GG 1 (%)5 (5.6)2 (3.4)2 (7.1)0.365
Gleason GG 2 (%)63 (70.8)40 (67.8)23 (82.1)
Gleason GG 3 (%)16 (18.0)12 (20.3)3 (10.7)
Gleason GG 4 (%)4 (4.5)4 (6.8)0 (0)
Gleason GG 5 (%)1 (1.1)1 (1.7)0 (0)
Failure of PGA (%)43 (48.3)30 (50.9%)12 (42.9%)0.502

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 368)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.368

Abstract #

368

Poster Bd #

N6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Abhishek Kumar

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Microboost dose escalation for localized prostate cancer within a statewide radiation oncology quality consortium.

First Author: Samuel Regan