“It just makes sense to me”: Patient experiences with prostate MRI during prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors

null

Ryan Sutherland

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Ryan Sutherland , Cary Philip Gross , Xiaomei Ma , Farah Jeong , Tyler M Seibert , Matthew R. Cooperberg , William Catalona , Stacy Loeb , Dena Schulman-Green , Michael Leapman

Organizations

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, New York University, New York, NY, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Although prostate MRI is commonly used in the diagnosis, staging and active surveillance of prostate cancer, little is known about patient perspectives on MRI imaging. Methods: We performed a qualitative descriptive study consisting of in-depth, semi-structured interviews of patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Interviews focused on experiences with prostate MRI and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy during active surveillance monitoring. We purposively sampled patients who received prostate MRI as part of their clinical care, over-sampling Black and Latino men, and conducted interviews until thematic saturation. We performed conventional content analysis to analyze data. Results: The mean sample (n=20) age was 68 years (range 51-79). Fourteen (70%) participants identified as White, 5(25%) as Black, and 2(10%) as Hispanic/Latino. At diagnosis, 17 (85%) had a Gleason grade group 1, and 3 (15%) had a grade group 2 tumor. Overall, participants viewed prostate MRI as a valuable tool that accurately localizes and monitors prostate cancer over time. Prostate MRI was seen as central to active surveillance monitoring. We identified five thematic categories: (1) the experiential aspects of undergoing an MRI scan; (2) the experience of visualizing one’s own prostate and prostate cancer; (3) adequacy of provider explanations of MRI results; (4) confidence in prostate MRI in decision-making; and (5) the role of prostate MRI in longitudinal follow-up during active surveillance, including an interest using MRI to modify the timing of, or replace, prostate biopsy. Conclusions: These findings reveal that patients highly value prostate MRI as a tool that enhances the confidence in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer. This work can inform future studies to optimize the patient experience, education and counseling during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 334)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.334

Abstract #

334

Poster Bd #

L12

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Partial gland ablation outcomes for localized prostate cancer in patients with MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions.

First Author: Alec Zhu

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial differences in the utilization of MRI-guided biopsy before prostate cancer diagnosis.

First Author: Grace L. Lu-Yao