Nivolumab (Nivo) + platinum-doublet chemotherapy (Chemo) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment (Tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with <1% tumor PD-L1 expression: Results from CheckMate 227.

Authors

Hossein Borghaei

Hossein Borghaei

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Hossein Borghaei , Matthew David Hellmann , Luis G. Paz-Ares , Suresh S. Ramalingam , Martin Reck , Kenneth John O'Byrne , Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran , Faith Ellen Nathan , Julie R. Brahmer

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany, Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826), a phase 3 study of 1L nivo + ipilimumab (ipi), nivo, or nivo + chemo vs chemo in advanced NSCLC, met its co-primary endpoint of prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with nivo + ipi vs chemo in patients (pts) with tumor mutational burden ≥10 mutations/Mb. Identifying effective tx for pts without known predictive biomarkers remains an unmet need. Prior studies suggest addition of chemo to anti–PD-(L)1 tx can improve outcomes in an unselected pt population, although benefit is most pronounced in pts with higher tumor PD-L1 expression. We report results for nivo + chemo vs chemo in pts with < 1% tumor PD-L1 expression. Methods: Pts (n = 550) with chemo-naive, stage IV/recurrent NSCLC, no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations, and < 1% tumor PD-L1 expression were stratified by tumor histology and randomized 1:1:1 to nivo 3 mg/kg Q2W + ipi 1 mg/kg Q6W, nivo 360 mg Q3W + chemo, or chemo (optional pemetrexed maintenance after chemo for nonsquamous [non-SQ] NSCLC). Pts were treated up to 2 yr. A descriptive analysis was performed for the secondary endpoint of PFS for nivo + chemo vs chemo in pts with < 1% tumor PD-L1 expression. No alpha was allocated for this analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between nivo + chemo (n = 177) and chemo (n = 186) arms. PFS was improved with nivo + chemo vs chemo (HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.58, 0.94]; minimum follow-up 11.2 mo; descriptive comparison). PFS benefit with nivo + chemo was observed across most subgroups. Among histologic subgroups, benefit was more pronounced in non-SQ (HR = 0.68) relative to SQ NSCLC (HR = 0.92). Rates of any grade tx-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were 13% with nivo + chemo and 14% with chemo. Conclusions: 1L nivo + chemo improved PFS vs chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC and < 1% tumor PD-L1 expression, and was well tolerated. Results are encouraging in this analysis, which includes only pts with < 1% PD-L1. CheckMate 227 Part 2 (ongoing) is evaluating nivo + chemo vs chemo irrespective of PD-L1 expression and will further inform benefit from this combination across different subgroups of NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02477826

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 9001)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9001

Abstract #

9001

Abstract Disclosures