Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
Julie R. Brahmer , Jong-Seok Lee , Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu , Reyes Bernabe Caro , Makoto Nishio , Lazlo Urban , Clarisse Audigier-Valette , Lorena Lupinacci , Randeep S. Sangha , Luis G. Paz-Ares , Martin Reck , Hossein Borghaei , Kenneth John O'Byrne , Ravi Gupta , Judith Bushong , Li Li , Steven I. Blum , Laura Eccles , Suresh S. Ramalingam
Background: In CheckMate 227 part 1 (NCT02477826), 1L NIVO + IPI demonstrated long-term, durable survival benefit vs platinum-doublet chemo in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level. Here we present the longest reported follow-up (5 y) of a phase 3 trial of 1L combination immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ALK alterations, and an ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled and stratified by histology. Pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. Pts were treated until progression, toxicity, or ≤ 2 y for immunotherapy. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and a novel efficacy endpoint, treatment-free interval. Treatment-free interval was measured in pts who discontinued study therapy (for any reason including treatment completion) and was defined as the time from last study dose to start of subsequent systemic therapy or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Minimum follow-up was 61.3 mo (database lock, Feb 15, 2022). In pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% (N = 1189), continued long-term OS benefit was seen with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66–0.91]); 5-y OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 17% (NIVO), and 14% (chemo). OS benefit also continued in pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% (N = 550) for NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52–0.81]); 5-y OS rates were 19% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO + chemo), and 7% (chemo). Clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed across additional efficacy endpoints in the overall population and in pts alive at 5 y (table). PFS, ORR, and DOR with NIVO and NIVO + chemo will be presented. Among pts alive at 5 y in the NIVO + IPI group, 66% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 64% (PD-L1 < 1%) remained treatment-free ≥ 3 y after discontinuing study therapy; median (range) duration of NIVO ± IPI therapy was 17.7 (0-25.5) mo (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 9.5 (0-25.1) mo (PD-L1 < 1%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With a 5-y minimum follow-up, NIVO + IPI continues to provide long-term, durable clinical benefit vs chemo in previously untreated pts with metastatic NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression. NIVO + IPI led to increased 5-y survivorship; the majority of these pts were treatment-free for ≥ 3 y post-treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826.
Treatment | NIVO + IPI | Chemo | NIVO + IPI | Chemo |
---|---|---|---|---|
PD-L1 | ≥ 1% | ≥ 1% | < 1% | < 1% |
Pts alive at 5 y, n | 89 | 50 | 33 | 12 |
ORR, n (%) | 71 (80) | 27 (54) | 27 (82) | 6 (50) |
5-y DOR rate, % | 54 | 17 | 41 | NA |
All pts, n | 396 | 397 | 187 | 186 |
5-y OS rate, % | 24 | 14 | 19 | 7 |
ORR, n (%) | 144 (36) | 118 (30) | 51 (27) | 43 (23) |
5-y DOR rate, % | 28 | 3 | 21 | NA |
NA, not applicable.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Luis G. Paz-Ares
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Luis G. Paz-Ares
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Martin Reck