Intensive chemotherapy (IC) versus hypomethylating agents (HMA) for the treatment of younger patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and elevated bone marrow blasts.

Authors

null

Paolo Strati

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Paolo Strati , Guillermo Garcia-Manero , Tapan M. Kadia , Gautam Borthakur , Marina Konopleva , Naval Guastad Daver , Courtney Denton Dinardo , Nicholas James Short , Musa Yilmaz , Kiran Naqvi , Sherry Pierce , Jorge E. Cortes , Hagop M. Kantarjian , Farhad Ravandi

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia Department, Houston, TX, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: The AZA-001 trial has shown a survival advantage for patients with high-risk MDS treated with HMA as compared to IC. However, this study was conducted mainly in an older population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with MDS, younger than 60 years of age, with ≥ 10% bone marrow blasts who received frontline treatment with HMA or anthracycline-cytarabine-based IC at our institution between 10/1993 and 12/2017. Results: One-hundred and six patients were included in the study, 57 treated with HMA and 49 with IC. Use of IC was associated with shorter time to response (1 vs 2 months; p < 0.001) and higher overall response rate (ORR; 82% vs 60%, p = 0.02). On univariate analysis (UA) age younger than 50 (p = 0.03) and use of IC (p = 0.02) were associated with ORR, but on multivariate analysis (MVA) only use of IC maintained its association (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2-9.1; p < 0.001). Rates of treatment discontinuation secondary to early death or toxicity were comparable; 31% of patients on HMA and 33% on IC proceeded to stem cell transplant (SCT). After a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-178 months), 38 (51%) out of 74 patients lost their response, and median response duration (RD) was 19 months (range, 1-166 months). Factors associated with longer RD on UA were lack of unfavorable cytogenetics (p = 0.04), consolidation with SCT in first remission (p = 0.009) and use of IC (p = 0.03); on MVA, use of IC maintained its association (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-5.8, p = 0.03). Eight (8%) patients transformed to acute myeloid leukemia during frontline treatment, 7 (12%) on HMA and 1 (2%) on IC (p = 0.07). At most recent follow-up, 65 (61%) patients died, median overall survival was 21 months (range, 1-178 months) and was significantly longer for patients treated with IC (43 vs 15 months; p = 0.05). Conclusions: IC is more effective than HMA for younger patients with MDS and bone marrow blasts ≥ 10%, irrespective of other baseline characteristics. Strategies combining targeted agents with either HMA or IC should be investigated, to determine whether this advantage will be maintained.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 7064)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.7064

Abstract #

7064

Poster Bd #

124

Abstract Disclosures