CYTO-CHIP: Cytoreductive surgery versus cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: A propensity-score analysis from BIG RENAPE and FREGAT working groups.

Authors

null

Pierre Emmanuel Bonnot

Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, FR

Pierre Emmanuel Bonnot , Guillaume Piessen , Marc Pocard , Bernard Meunier , Jean Marc Bereder , Karine Abboud , Frederic Marchal , Francois Quenet , Diane Goere , Simon Msika , Catherine Arvieux , Nicolas Pirro , Romuald Wernert , Patrick RAT , Denis Pezet , Jérémie Lefevre , Thomas Courvoisier , Reza Kianmanesh , Pierre Meeus , Olivier Glehen

Organizations

Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, FR, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France, Hopital Lariboisiere AP-HP, Service de Chirurgie Digestie et Cancérologie, Paris, France, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France, University Hospital Archet, Nice, France, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint Etienne, France, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Hopital Louis Mourier, AP-HP, Paris, France, CHU La Tronche, Grenoble, France, Hopital La Timône, AP-HM, Marseille, France, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Paul Papin, Angers, France, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France, CHU, Clermond-Ferrand, France, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France, CHU REIMS, Reims, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is considered by most as an end-stage disease. Poor outcomes are achieved with palliative chemotherapy. Aggressive combination of cytroreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) are still debated in this indication. Purpose: to assess the impact of HIPEC on survival and postoperative outcomes after complete CRS compared with CRS alone (CRSa) Methods: Data from 277 consecutive patients treated for gastric cancer with PC in 19 French centers from 1989 to 2014 were collected. 180 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC were compared to 97 treated by CRSa. Extension of PC was assessed by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). Only patients treated by complete CRS were included (CC-0 or CC-1). To assess the effect of HIPEC and to account for confounding factors, a Cox proportional hazards regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity score was used. Multivariate models and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: After propensity weighting, groups were similar except for the PCI that remained higher in the HIPEC group (median: 6 v 2, P = .003). However, there was no difference in the completeness of CRS (CC-0: 76.7% v 83.5 %, P = .904). HIPEC was associated with improved overall survival (OS) on both multivariate and IPTW models. On IPTW analysis, median OS was 18.8 v 12.1 months. 3- and 5-years OS were 26.21% and 19.87% v 10.82% and 6.43% (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.37; P = .005). 3- and 5-years disease-free survival were 20.40% and 17.05% v 5.87% and 3.76% (P = .001). Mortality rate (7.4% v 10.1%, P = .820) and grade 3-4 morbidity (53.7% v 55.3%, P = .496) at 90 days were similar. Surgical morbidity was 37.1% v 38.8% in CRSa group. Conclusions: Compared to CRSa, HIPEC was associated with increased OS and potential disease eradication for gastric cancer with PC, without additional morbidity. This treatment, when optimal CRS can be achieved, should be considered as the gold standard since outcomes remain grim with chemotherapies. Clinical trail information: NCT03253939

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid-Fire Abstract Session: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 4S; abstr 8)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.4_suppl.8

Abstract #

8

Abstract Disclosures