Do hospitalized cancer patients requiring palliative care consultation discharged to subacute rehabilitation ever get anticancer therapy again?

Authors

null

Muhammad Azeem Khan

Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC

Muhammad Azeem Khan, Clint S. Pettit, Hunter Groninger

Organizations

Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC

Research Funding

Other

Background: Patients with advanced cancer inevitably experience a functional decline that is often associated with notable symptom burden and/or indications for clarification of goals. Palliative care (PC) services frequently engage such patients during hospital stays. For many of these patients, discharge plans to sub-acute rehabilitation facilities (SAR) in order to ‘gain strength’ for future cancer treatment is a common practice. We wished to examine if inpatients with advanced cancer receiving PC consultation who are discharged to SAR are ever able to follow up with their oncology team and receive anti-cancer therapy. Methods: A search was conducted in our institution’s electronic medical system for hospitalized patients with cancer who received inpatient PC consultation and were subsequently discharged to SAR. Patients were excluded if they did not follow with an oncologist at MWHC as an out patient prior to the admission being reviewed or if they had never received anti cancer therapy before. Results: From 2015-2017, 16 patients meeting our criteria were identified. For 14 (82.4%) patients Palliative Care was consulted to either discuss goals of care and/or assist with pain management.13 (76%) patients were discharged to SAR to ‘improve strength’. However only 7 (44%) patients saw their oncologist after discharge from SAR. Of those 7 only 3 (19%) received further anti cancer therapy. 4 of the 7 (57%) patients that saw their oncologist after SAR had an ECOG of 1 on admission, the other 3 had an ECOG of 2. No patient with an ECOG of 2 or greater ever received cancer treatment again. Exactly half of the 16 patients were eventually readmitted to our hospital. Conclusions: SAR may not be an appropriate discharge disposition for patients with cancer who have a decline in functional status. Less than half the patients with cancer discharged to SAR from our institute with the intention to gain strength for future chemotherapy saw their oncologist again and the overwhelming majority (particularly those with an ECOG performance score of 2 and greater) never received anti cancer therapy again. This data can be considered to make informed decisions when discussing goals of care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management,Caregiver Support

Sub Track

Coordination and Continuity of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 62)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.62

Abstract #

62

Poster Bd #

G4

Abstract Disclosures