Prognostic factors of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER2 positive gastric cancer.

Authors

null

Shoko Marshall

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Shoko Marshall , Takeru Wakatsuki , Tomohiro Matsushima , Hiroki Osumi , Mariko Ogura , Takashi Ichimura , Daisuke Takahari , Eiji Shinozaki , Keisho Chin , Kensei Yamaguchi

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Prognostic factor in patients with HER2 positive gastric cancer who received trastuzumab (T-mab) based chemotherapy remains unclear. The aim of this study is to reveal the clinical factors which predict prognosis in T-mab based chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed HER2 positive gastric cancer patients treated with T-mab based chemotherapy in our institute from March 2011 to June 2016. Patients’ demographics according to the ToGA study and laboratory data were examined. Results: Total of 143 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up period was 14.9 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.2 months (95% CI: 8.6-13.9) and 20.9 months (95% CI: 16.6-25.2), respectively. In univariate analysis, performance status (0 vs. 1-2), present of measurable lesion, presence of visceral metastases, No. of metastatic lesion (1-4 vs. > 4), LDH, ALP, Alb, median CEA (≧ 13.6 mg/ml vs. < 13.6mg/ml), and median Neutrophil/Lymphocyte (N/L) ratio (≧ 3.11 vs. < 3.11) were significantly associated with PFS. Regarding OS, extension of disease (locally advanced vs. metastatic), presence of visceral metastases, No. of metastatic lesions, Hb, ALP, Alb, CRP, median CEA and median N/L ratio were significant. In multivariate analysis, CEA levels (HR 0.54: 95%CI 0.34-0.86, p = 0.010) and ALP (HR 0.57: 95%CI 0.33-0.99, p = 0.046) retained to be significant in regard to PFS. Patients with < median CEA level had a median PFS of 13.1 months vs. 7.2 months with ≧ median CEA level. Patients with normal level of ALP showed a median PFS of 12.8 months vs. 5.9 months with abnormal ALP level. With respect to OS, CEA levels (HR 0.59: 95%CI 0.34-1.03, p = 0.061) and N/L ratio (HR 0.55: 95%CI 0.29-1.06, p = 0.074) were marginally significant. Patients with < median CEA level had a median OS of 27.6 months vs. 17.6 months with ≧ median CEA level. Patients with > median N/L had a median OS of 24.5 months vs. 16.5 month with ≧ median N/L. Conclusions: Lower CEA levels and normal ALP levels were associated with favorable PFS, and lower CEA and N/L ratio were marginally associated with favorable OS.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Screening

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 4S; abstract 41)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.41

Abstract #

41

Poster Bd #

E19

Abstract Disclosures