Impact of sarcopenia on survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC).

Authors

null

Keiji Sugiyama

Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Keiji Sugiyama , Yukiya Narita , Seiichiro Mitani , Kazunori Honda , Toshiki Masuishi , Hiroya Taniguchi , Shigenori Kadowaki , Takashi Ura , Masashi Ando , Masahiro Tajika , Kei Muro

Organizations

Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi-Ken, Japan, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor in several cancers. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of sarcopenia on survival outcomes among pts with mGC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 170 consecutive pts with mGC starting first-line chemotherapy at the single institution during January 2013–December 2014. Inclusion criteria were as follows: treatment with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based regimen, ECOG PS 0–2, and adequate organ function. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated from cross-sectional area of muscle at L3 using CT scan divided by the square of the height. Baseline sarcopenia (S) was defined as 53.4 cm2/m2 for men and 38.5 cm2/m2for women. Muscle loss after chemotherapy (L) was defined as 10% ≤ reduction in SMI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify whether S and L were independent prognostic factors of time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis included variables with p values ≤ 0.1 in univariate analyses. Results: Ninety-seven pts met the inclusion criteria; 83 (86%) were classified with S, and 39 (31%) with L. PS (0 vs. 1 and 2) and ALP (ULN> vs. ULN) were significantly associated with L. Overall response rate for S, non-S, L, and non-L was 60%, 63%, 63%, and 61%, respectively. S was not associated with TTF or OS. However, L was significantly associated with a shorter TTF (4.7 vs. 7.3 m, HR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.16-2.85, p=0.009) and tended toward worse OS (14.2 vs. 19.7 m, HR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.78-2.20, p=0.29). Variables with p values ≤ 0.1 in univariate analyses for TTF were L, LDH (ULN≤), ALB (ULN>), and histology (poorly differentiated). Histology was only variables with p values ≤ 0.1 for OS (p=0.002). As per multivariate analyses, only L was a significant prognostic factor of TTF. Conclusions: L is an independent negative prognostic factor of TTF in pts with mGC. Intervention for muscle loss can be a therapeutic approach for mGC.

Factors associated with TTF

Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95% CI)p-value
Muscle loss1.82 (1.16-2.85)0.0011.79 (1.14-2.81)0.01
LDH1.86 (1.13-3.09)0.011.56 (0.89-2.72)0.12
Alb1.47 (0.5-2.29)0.071.26 (0.78-2.72)0.34
Histology1.53 (0.96-2.44)0.072.65 (1.41-4.97)0.11

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 4S; abstract 141)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.141

Abstract #

141

Poster Bd #

K11

Abstract Disclosures