A randomized phase III trial of second-line chemotherapy comparing CPT-11 alone versus S-1 plus CPT-11 combination therapy in advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line therapy with S-1 (JACCRO GC-05).

Authors

null

Kazuhiro Nishikawa

Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Kazuhiro Nishikawa , Kazuaki Tanabe , Masashi Fujii , Chikara Kunisaki , Akihito Tsuji , Nobuhisa Matsuhashi , Akinori Takagane , Tetsuro Ohno , Tomono Kawase , Mitsugu Kochi , Kazuhiro Yoshida , Yoshihiro Kakeji , Wataru Ichikawa , Keisho Chin , Masanori Terashima , Masahiro Takeuchi , Toshifusa Nakajima

Organizations

Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan, Hakodate Goryokaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan, Sakai City Hospital, Sakai, Japan, Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan, Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: In East Asia, S-1 + CDDP (SP) has been employed as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) from the results of SPIRITS trial. Patients who were resistant to chemotherapy with S-1 in the first-line treatment were widely treated with taxane alone or CPT-11 alone as the second-line treatment. On the other hand, the response rate of combination therapy with S-1 is higher than that of CPT-11 alone. Then, we hypothesized that S-1 + CPT-11 prolongs survival in the second-line treatment comparing with CPT-11 alone after failure in the first-line treatment with S-1. (NCT00639327). Methods: Patients with AGC who confirmed disease progression by imaging after the first-line therapy with SP, S-1 + cocetaxel or S-1 alone except S-1 + CPT-11 were allocated into S-1 plus CPT-11 group (Group A) or CPT-11 alone group (Group B) as second-line chemotherapy. Patients who were relapsed to adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 were not enrolled. Primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression free survival, response rate and adverse events. Results: From March 2008 to June 2011, 304 patients were enrolled, and 294 were eligible for analysis. The overall survival was 8.8 months (M) in the Group A and 9.4M in the Group B. There is no statistically significant difference in both groups (P=0.9156). The progression free survival was 4.8M in the Group A and 4.9M in the Group B (P=0.1568). The response rate was 7.6% in the Group A and 7.4% in the Group B. Grade 3 or higher leukopenia, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed more frequently in the Group A than in the Group B. Conclusions: From our results, we do not recommend consecutive use of S-1 as second-line treatment in patients who are refractory to S-1 in first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: 00639327.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

00639327

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 3; abstr 87)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.87

Abstract #

87

Poster Bd #

C25

Abstract Disclosures