Treatment and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A Swedish population-based study (2000-2008).

Authors

null

Ulrika Harmenberg

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Ulrika Harmenberg , Sven Lundstam , Thomas Wahlgren , Jan Kowalski , Maria Jakobsson , Rickard Sandin , Börje Ljungberg , Per Sandström

Organizations

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg, Sweden, Pfizer AB, Sollentuna, Sweden, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: This retrospective register study assessed OS in all mRCC patients in Sweden diagnosed before (2000–2005) and after (2006–2008) the introduction of targeted therapies, plus factors and treatment options influencing OS. Methods: Three Swedish national health registers were used: the Swedish Cancer register (diagnosis and death), the National Patient Register (in-/out-patient data), and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. From 2000-2008, 3,243 patients were identified with mRCC; 602 were recorded as receiving 1st-line treatment. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, including estimation of adjusted OS, was used in three models with the covariates: diagnosis period, age, gender, institution size, nephrectomy status, geographic region (all models); mRCC treatments, defined as any tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; Model 1; n=417); sunitinib (SU), sorafenib (SO), and interferon-alfa (IFN-α) in the 1st-line setting (Model 2; n=602 [SU=244, SO=110, IFN-α=248]); and variations of these drugs as 1st- and 2nd-line treatment sequences (Model 3; n=602). Results: Amongst mRCC patients diagnosed from 2006-2008 compared with 2000-2005, median adjusted OS was 16.1 vs. 10.9 months, respectively (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.83; P<0.001). In all three models, factors independently associated with significantly improved OS included female gender, large institution, and prior nephrectomy. Prescription of any TKI (Model 1: HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.93; P=0.002) and 1st-line SU treatment (Model 2: HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.94; P=0.007) were associated with significantly improved OS compared with other or no treatments. A similar significant improvement in OS was also confirmed for patients treated with SU only in Model 3; however, due to a low number of observations, the model had insufficient statistical power to be appropriate for all sequences. Conclusions: An improved OS for mRCC patients was demonstrated for the period 2006-2008 compared with 2000-2005. Although the observed survival advantage is multifactorial in origin, contribution of targeted therapies is highly probable. Of the drugs studied, given design limitations, only SU was associated with improved OS.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session E: Renal Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr 389)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.5_suppl.389

Abstract #

389

Poster Bd #

C12

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Renee Maria Saliby

First Author: Zhaohui Arter

First Author: Florence Marteau