Evaluating intermediate endpoints (IE) for overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): An IMDC study.

Authors

null

Renee Maria Saliby

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Renee Maria Saliby , Wanling Xie , J Connor Wells , Eddy Saad , Marc Eid , Chris Labaki , Karl Semaan , Evan Ferrier , Audreylie Lemelin , Cristina Suárez , Jose Manuel Ruiz-Morales , Thomas Powles , Lori Wood , Hedyeh Ebrahimi , Guillermo de Velasco , Kosuke null Takemura , Neeraj Agarwal , David A. Braun , Daniel Yick Chin Heng , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, BC Cancer Agency, Calgary, AB, Canada, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada, Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Medica Sur SAB de CV, Toriello Guerra, DF, Mexico, Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Yale University, New Haven, CT, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: In Ph3 trials, assessment for primary endpoint of OS necessitates extended follow-up (f/u) periods, larger pool of events, and higher associated costs. We sought to determine if shorter IEs like Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT) are associated with OS in patients (pts) receiving ICI-based trt. Methods: We included all International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) pts who received contemporary approved first line(1L) ICI from 2013 to 2023. IEs were defined from ICI start until drug cessation or death for TTF, and initiation of next line or death for TTNT, or censored at date of last f/u. Associations of OS with TTF and TTNT status at 6-mo landmark were assessed using Cox regression adjusting for IMDC risk groups, metastatic sites, histology, age, and prior nephrectomy, stratified by treatment (trt) and yrs of ICI start. Endpoint associations across all f/u time were evaluated using Kendall’s Tau (KT) correlation by Clayton copula. A KT >0.49 indicates a strong correlation (Wicklin R., 2023).Results: The cohort consisted of 1667 pts with a median f/u of 15.4 mo (IQR: 7.1-28.6). Median age at 1L start was 63 yrs (IQR: 56-70), with 73% being male and 65% undergoing nephrectomy before starting 1L. 1132 patients received dual ICI, while 535 received an ICI+TKI combination. Pts who discontinued their 1L regimen within the 6-mo landmark demonstrated poor OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.74 (95% CI: 2.15-3.49). Additionally, those who transitioned to a 2L therapy within the first 6 mo showed worse OS, reflected by an HR of 2.82 (2.22-3.59). KT correlation with OS across all follow up was 0.49 (0.45, 0.52) for TTF and 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) for TTNT. Consistent results were seen across all subgroups with the strongest association in the ICI+TKI group (Table). Conclusions: TTNT demonstrated the strongest association with OS, particularly in the ICI+TKI subgroup, making it a potentially clinically meaningful intermediate endpoint for evaluating efficacy in ICI-based regimens.

Association of intermediate endpoints with OS in whole cohort and by IMDC and trt group.

At 6-mo LandmarkAll f/u
TTFTTNTTTFTTNT
Evaluable N1255*1276*16281656
Adjusted Hazard ratio (95%CI)
(with vs. without IE event)
Kendall's tau correlation
Overall N=16672.74(2.15-3.49)2.82(2.22-3.59)0.49(0.45-0.52)0.67(0.64-0.69)
IMDC risk groups N=1397
Favorable N=2401.92(1.03-3.60)3.33(1.66-6.71)0.44(0.32-0.56)0.66(0.55-0.76)
Intermediate N=7482.81(1.99-3.96)2.93(2.09-4.10)0.46(0.40-0.52)0.63(0.57-0.68)
Poor N=4093.72(2.39-5.79)3.00(1.90-4.74)0.56(0.50-0.61)0.68(0.63-0.73)
Trt
ICI+ICI N=11322.47(1.86-3.26)2.75(2.09-3.61)0.43(0.39-0.48)0.63(0.58-0.66)
ICI+TKI N=5353.41(2.19-5.31)3.10(1.88-5.11)0.61(0.54-0.66)0.73(0.66-0.78)

*Excluding pts who died within 6 mo or had not been followed more than 6 mo.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 400)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.400

Abstract #

400

Poster Bd #

G3

Abstract Disclosures