Background: DOC given for 8 consecutive courses is considered a standard first line treatment for CRPC pts and I administration could reduce its impact on quality of life (QL). E is considered synergistic with DOC. Aim of this study was to evaluate in a 2 × 2 factorial design, if I DOC could improve QL compared to C DOC and whether E added to DOC could improve its activity. Methods: CRPC pts were randomized to: C DOC 70 mg/m² i.v. q 3 wks for 8 courses, alone (arm A) or with E 280 mg/TID p.o. for 5 days starting on -1 day (arm B), or the same treatments given with a 3-month rest period after the first 4 courses (arm C and D, respectively). The primary end points were QL (EORTC QLQ C30 and BPI) of A+B vs C+D and 1-y PFS (according to PCWG2) of A+C vs B+D. Results: From 11/06 to 10/10, 148 CRPC pts were enrolled and 124 pts are presently evaluable (24 too early). The median age was 69 (range 42-81) and the median baseline PSA was 55.6 (range 0.33-4212). The major hematological toxicities were: anemia G3 (3 pts), neutropenia G3 (4 pts) – G4 (5 pts), febrile neutropenia (5 pts). QL outcomes of C and I groups, were not statistically different in terms of general QL items. 1-y PFS was also superimposable (10% and 13.5%, respectively) for DOC and DOC+E groups. The 2-y overall survival was also evaluated with no differences between I and C groups (42.5% and 53.7% respectively) and between DOC and DOC+E groups (42.8% and 53.5% respectively). Conclusions: These preliminary results seem to indicate that I treatment may not improve QL compared to C treatment. Moreover, the addition of E to DOC did not improve 1-y PFS of CRPC pts. Updated data with the complete sample analysis will be presented.