Randomized phase II study (GATE study) of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors

Eric Van Cutsem

E. Van Cutsem

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

E. Van Cutsem , C. Boni , J. Tabernero , B. Massuti , D. A. Richards , H. Prenen , I. Steinberg , P. Rougier

Organizations

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, Division of Oncolgy, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Medical Oncology Alicante University Hospital, Alicante, Spain, US Oncology Research, LLC, The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX, Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg/Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, sanofi-aventis, Cambridge, MA, European Hospital George Pompidou, Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil (TCF) improved time to progression and survival compared with CF in advanced gastric cancer (GC). We conducted a randomized phase II study of T plus oxaliplatin (E) with or without fluorouracil (F) or capecitabine (X) in advanced GC. Methods: The GATE study is a multinational, randomized, 3-parallel-arm, stratified study. Optimal doses for all regimens were determined in a pilot phase. Patients ≥18 of age, with a KPS >70 and histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced GC not treated with chemotherapy for advanced GC were randomized to TEF (T 50 mg/m² followed by E 85 mg/m² simultaneously with folinic acid 400 mg/m² followed by F 2400 mg/m² as a 46-hr continuous infusion on Day 1, q2w), TE (T 75 mg/m² followed by E 130 mg/m² on Day 1 q3w), and TEX (T 50 mg/m² followed by E 100 mg/m² Day 1, q3w and X 625 mg/m² BID continuously). The primary objective was time to progression (TTP) in the evaluable population; secondary objectives included response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 254 patients were randomized, and 248 received treatment (n=88 TEF, n=78 TE, n=82 TEX). Baseline characteristics were balanced among treatment groups. Most common Gr 3–4 adverse events across treatment arms were fatigue (20.6%), sensory neuropathy (13.7%), diarrhea (12.5%), and anorexia (6.0%); the febrile neutropenia rate was 8.1%. The proportion of deaths due to adverse events were 3.4% with TEF vs. 5.1% with TE and 13.4% with TEX. Conclusions: In patients with advanced GC, treatment with TEF was associated with improved TTP, RR and OS, with a better safety profile compared with TE and TEX.


n TTP median (mos) (95% CI) RR (%) OS median (mos) (95% CI) Adverse events (%) grade 3-4

TEF 88 7.7 (7.0–9.4) 46.6 14.6 (11.7–21.8) 61
TE 78 4.5 (3.7–5.3) 23.1 9.0 (7.8–10.9) 77
TEX 82 5.6 (4.3–6.4) 25.6 11.3 (8.1–14.0) 67

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal, Gastric, or Small Bowel

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00382720

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 4018)

Abstract #

4018

Poster Bd #

11

Abstract Disclosures