Ponatinib in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Preliminary findings from a phase I study in hematologic malignancies.

Authors

null

M. Talpaz

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

M. Talpaz , N. P. Shah , M. W. Deininger , M. J. Mauro , I. W. Flinn , S. Lustgarten , W. Lindmark , J. M. Gozgit , T. Clackson , C. D. Turner , F. G. Haluska , H. Kantarjian , J. E. Cortes

Organizations

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Ponatinib is an oral multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor and potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor. Preliminary phase 1 results suggest substantial activity in BCR-ABL+ patients (pts). In preclinical models, ponatinib also inhibits the FLT3/ITD mutant prevalent in AML with potency similar to that of BCR-ABL (IC50 2 nM). A cohort of pts with AML was enrolled in a phase 1 trial of ponatinib to assess safety and preliminary efficacy in this population. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with relapsed or refractory AML were enrolled after the recommended phase 2 dose of ponatinib was established in pts with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Pts received 45 mg ponatinib orally once daily: trough plasma concentrations are known to exceed the target for inhibition of FLT3/ITD activity (IC50) in cells at this dose. FLT3/ITD mutation status was determined at a central laboratory. Results: Of 81 total pts in this study, 12 were included in the AML cohort. The median age of AML pts was 49 (range 30-72) years. At the time of analysis (Dec 15, 2010), 4 (33%) AML pts remained on study (range 77-143 days) and 8 (67%) discontinued (range 10-97 days) (no discontinuations were treatment related). Seven AML pts had documented FLT3/ITD at baseline, 2 did not carry FLT3 alterations, and 3 pts had inadequate samples for testing; however, these 3 pts had a positive FLT3 status reported by investigative sites. Overall, 7 pts with the FLT3/ITD mutation were FLT3 inhibitor naïve. All pts had treatment emergent AEs consistent with those expected in refractory AML. Three pts had treatment related grade 2 pancreatitis: 1 pt subsequently discontinued due to investigator decision; 2 had the event resolve and continued therapy at a reduced dose. The overall response rate in the AML cohort was 25% (3/12): 2 pts (29%) had CRi and 1 (14%) had PR. All responses observed were in the subset of pts with the FLT3/ITD mutation who were naïve to FLT3 inhibitors: 3/7 (43%). Conclusions: Ponatinib was well‑tolerated in this small group of AML patients; the safety profile was similar to that observed in CML. Evidence of activity in pts with the FLT3/ITD mutation was observed, with a response rate of 43% (3/7) in FLT3 inhibitor naïve pts.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Leukemia

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00660920

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 6518)

Abstract #

6518

Poster Bd #

10

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Carol Smyth

First Author: Carol Smyth

First Author: Mark J. Levis