Association of BCR-ABL mutation testing in patients with CML with likelihood of improvement in subsequent BCR-ABL test results.

Authors

null

Carol Smyth

Medivo, Inc., New York, NY

Carol Smyth , Jason M. Bhan , Ajitpal Singh Dhaliwal , Tatiana Sorokina , Niyati Parikh , Jason S. Levitz , Jerald P. Radich

Organizations

Medivo, Inc., New York, NY, Onc and Hem Sp, Far Hills, NJ, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Mutational analysis is important in management of patients with CML. We compared BCR-ABL test results in patients who were tested for mutation after showing poor response to treatment vs. those who were not tested, to determine if mutation testing is associated with improved treatment response. Methods: We studied data from 40,000 CML patients in the Medivo Lab Value Exchange Database who were tested for BCR-ABL between 2011- 2014, and identified 6,247 instances where CML patients demonstrated a + slope in test results (defined: any subsequent test result > previous test result). We used + slope as a proxy for poor treatment response. The average time difference between two consecutive tests was 123 days. We found 183 instances (3%) where patients were tested for BCR-ABL mutation soon after showing poor treatment response, and 6,064 instances (97%) where patients were not tested. Logistic regression was used to assess whether patients who were tested for mutation were more likely to show improvement in later BCR-ABL test results than patients who were not tested. Results: Out of 183 instances where patients were tested for mutation, in 149 instances, patients showed improvement (81%) and in 34 instances, patients showed no improvement (19%). Out of 6,064 instances where patients were not tested for mutation, in 4,504 instances, patients showed improvement (74%) and in 1,560 instances, patients showed no improvement (26%). Logistic regression analysis showed that testing for BCR-ABL mutation was associated with a higher likelihood (52%) of subsequent improvement in BCR-ABL test values than not being tested for mutation, a statistically significant result (OR = 1.52, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Our results support mutation testing in patients with CML showing poor response to treatment. Further analyses are needed to confirm that patient tested for mutation are more likely to have changes in therapy and potentially better patient outcomes. Further analyses will also look at treatment choices, duration of treatment, and time to achieve MMR in these patient populations.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) and Mast Cell Disorders

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr e18074)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e18074

Abstract #

e18074

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Carol Smyth

Abstract

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Population based testing and treatment characteristics for CML.

First Author: Timothy Styles