Cost-effectiveness of liquid biopsy for molecular profiling of newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.

Authors

null

Aaron C. Tan

Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Aaron C. Tan , Sibo Liu , Nicholas Graves

Organizations

Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Liquid biopsy is complementary to tissue biopsy for lung cancer profiling, yet evidence of the cost-effectiveness is limited. This could retard implementation and reimbursement in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of profiling strategies that include liquid biopsy and to identify the optimal profiling approach for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an Asian population using Singapore as an example. Methods: A decision tree and partitioned-survival model was developed from the Singapore healthcare system’s perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five molecular profiling strategies: either tissue or plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) alone, a concurrent, and two sequential approaches. Model inputs were informed by local data or published literature. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were undertaken to understand the robustness of the conclusions for decision making. The optimal strategy at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds was presented by cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier and the expected loss curve. Results: The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach revealed an additional 0.0981 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for an extra cost of S$3,074 over a 20-year time horizon compared to tissue NGS alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of S$31,318/QALY and an incremental net monetary benefit of S$1,343 per patient. The findings were sensitive to the costs of pembrolizumab and osimertinib and the probabilities of re-biopsy after tissue NGS. Sequential plasma-tissue NGS and plasma NGS alone were more costly and less effective than alternatives. Conclusions: The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach generated the highest net monetary benefit and was the optimal testing strategy when WTP was S$45,000/QALY. It retained superiority but understandably with a higher ICER when expensive, non-first line treatments were included. Overall, its routine clinical practice should be proactively considered for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Breakthrough

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Thoracic Cancers,Breast Cancer,Gynecologic Cancer,Head and Neck Cancer,Hematologic Malignancies,Genetics/Genomics/Multiomics,Healthtech Innovations,Models of Care and Care Delivery,Viral-Mediated Malignancies,Other Malignancies or Topics

Sub Track

Diagnostics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 23; abstr 178)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.23_suppl.178

Abstract #

178

Poster Bd #

G8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Dali Edwards

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Comparison between liquid biopsy and tissue NGS in two cohorts of advanced NSCLC.

First Author: Helena Bote

First Author: Christopher Lemmon