Background: The standard therapy for primary refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) involves the administration of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT). Nevertheless, several risk factors may influence survival outcomes. We assessed outcomes of patients in this setting who underwent HDC/ASCT by performing survival analysis and studying prognostic factors affecting survival. Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed/refractory HL who received HDC/ASCT between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients’ status evaluation before ASCT was performed by Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Scan and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan. The used conditioning regimen was BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences between groups were assessed using the Log-Rank test. Results: Thirty-five patients diagnosed with relapsed/refractory HL were included in the study. Among them, 26 patients (74%) had refractory disease, while 9 patients (26%) relapsed following completion of first-line chemotherapy. All patients were treated with HDC/ASCT. Prior to ASCT, 30 patients underwent assessment using FDG-PET Scan, while CT Scan was employed for evaluation in 5 patients. Twenty-three patients (66%) were in complete remission, 8 patients (23%) were in partial remission, and 4 patients (11%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 24.36 months after transplantation, 28 patients (80%) were in remission, 6 patients (17%) had disease progression, and one patients died of septic shock. The 2-year PFS and OS rates for the total population were 85.4% and 97.1%, respectively. Response to first-line chemotherapy did not have a substantial impact on prognosis, as evidenced by a 2-year PFS rate of 76.2% vs. 88.9% (p=0.88) and a 2-year OS rate of 100% vs. 96.2% (p=0.56) for patients with relapsed and refractory disease, respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS rates for patients receiving autograft during complete remission, partial response, and tumor progression were 93.8% vs. 87.5% vs. 50% (p=0.005), respectively; and 95.7% vs. 100% vs. 100%, respectively (p=0.77). Patients who had negative pre-transplant PET-Scans demonstrated a 2-year PFS rate of 92.9% vs. 64.8% for those with positive PET-scans (p=0.004). Conclusions: The findings of our study affirm the established practice of HDC/ASCT for individuals facing relapsed/refractory HL. The disease status at transplant and the pre-transplant PET-Scan status prove to be crucial factors in predicting patients’ outcomes, while response to first-line chemotherapy did not influence prognosis.