Real world outcome of patients with multiple myeloma who received bispecific antibodies after CAR-T therapy.

Authors

Radhika Bansal

Radhika Bansal

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Radhika Bansal , Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes , Larissa Brunaldi , Tyler B Sandahl , Matthew J. Rees , Suzanne R. Hayman , Moritz Binder , Nadine Abdallah , David Dingli , Joselle Cook , Morie A. Gertz , Prashant Kapoor , Taxiarchis Kourelis , Rahma M. Warsame , Shaji Kumar , Yi Lin

Organizations

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: There are 2 CAR-T products and 3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) that are FDA-approved for patients (pts) with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical trials experience to date suggests that clinical response of BsAb is less impacted after CAR-T therapy. We examined the outcome of pts who received BsAb in standard-of-care (SOC) practice at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Methods: Retrospective analysis of MM patients who received FDA-approved BsAb at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 12/2022- 1/2024. IMWG criteria was used for clinical response. Results: Sixty-two patients received BsAbs: 77% (48/62) received teclistamab, and 23% (14/62) received talquetamab. Median age was 62 years (range: 33-81), 60% (37/62) were males, and 45% (28/62) received prior CAR-T. Patients who had prior CAR-T therapy had more prior lines of therapy compared to those who did not. Overall, ORR to teclistamab was 61%, which is comparable to previous studies and other real-world reports. ORR and ≥CR rates were comparable between patients with and without prior CAR-T (Table). Of the 28 pts who received CAR-T before BsAbs, 61% (17/28) received idecabtagene vicleucel, 10% (3/28) were ciltacabtagene autoleucel, and 29% (8/28) on clinical trial. We then compared outcome of BsAb between pts who had relapsed from CAR-T within 1 year (n=21, median PFS: 8.84 months (range, 1.12, 10.84)) or after 1 year (n=7, median PFS: 16.62 months (range, 13.30, 36.20)). At the time of BsAb infusion, pts with who relapsed < 1 year vs ≥1 year post CAR-T had comparable blood counts, ALC, M-protein and involved FLC levels, CRP, ferritin and LDH. BsAb CR/sCR rate was significantly higher in pts with disease relapse ≥1 year compared to <1 year post CAR-T (57% vs 14%, p=0.02). Conclusions: Irrespective of prior CAR-T exposure, BsAb have clinical activity in SOC practice in pts with MM. Our preliminary data suggest that responses to BsAbs are better in pts with late compared to early relapse post CAR-T. Longer follow-up is needed to understand the duration of response. Larger, multi-center studies with longer follow-up will help identify factors that impact BsAb response post CAR-T.

Baseline demographics and clinical outcomes.

Variables at BsAb InfusionCART Exposed (N=28)No Prior CAR-T (N=34)Total (N=62)p value
Prior lines of therapy, median (Range)7.0 (4.0, 17.0)5.0 (2.0, 14.0)6.0 (2.0, 17.0)< 0.01
ORR, n (%)14.0 (50.0)18.0 (52.9)32.0 (51.6)0.54
CR/sCR, n (%)7.0 (25.0)5.0 (14.7)12.0 (19.4)0.31
PFS (months), median (95%CI)3.1 (2.3, NR)NR (1.2, NR)5.1 (2.6, NR)0.75
Timing of relapse post CAR-TRelapse <1 year (N=21)Relapse1 year (N=7)Total (N=28)P value
ALC at BsAb infusion, x10(9)/L, median (range)0.63 (0.2, 5.6)0.79 (0.5, 1.4)0.65 (0.2, 5.6)0.14
ORR, n (%)11.0 (52.4)6.0 (85.7)17.0 (60.7)0.12
CR/sCR, n (%)3.0 (14.3)4.0 (57.1)7.0 (25.0)0.02
PFS, months, median (95%CI)3.1 (1.8, NR)NR (2.3, NR)3.1 (2.3, NR)0.13

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Cell Therapy, Bispecific Antibodies, and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Plasma Cell Disorders

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 7520)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7520

Abstract #

7520

Poster Bd #

157

Abstract Disclosures