Class comparison of BCMA-directed therapies in relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors

null

Matthew J. Rees

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Matthew J. Rees , Aytaj Mammadzadeh , Abiola Bolarinwa , Mohammed E Elhaj , Arwa Bohra , Sikander Ailawadhi , Ricardo Parrondo , Saurabh Chhabra , Yi Lin , Moritz Binder , Suzanne R. Hayman , Angela Dispenzieri , Francis Buadi , David Dingli , Rahma M. Warsame , Radhika Bansal , Prashant Kapoor , Morie A. Gertz , Eli Muchtar , Shaji Kumar

Organizations

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: BCMA directed CAR T cells, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and T cell engagers (TCEs) each have distinct strengths and weaknesses. While these agents have shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes, no head-head comparisons exist. We assessed the relative efficacy of different BCMA-therapies in relapsed myeloma, with a focus on high-risk subgroups. Methods: Retrospective study of MM patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BCMA targeted therapies between April 2018-June 2023. Results: 385 patients (ADC=59, TCE=134, CAR T=192) with a median follow up of 20-months. The median time from diagnosis was 6.1 years. The table shows disease, and treatment characteristics. Amongst ADCs and TCEs recipients, the median treatment duration was 1.9 and 3.5 months respectively, disease progression (64% and 79%) and intolerance (22% and 10%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The overall response rates were 27, 50, and 86% for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Compared to ADCs, CAR T was associated with improved PFS (adjusted HRPFS=0.29, 95%CI=0.20-0.43) and OS (aHROS=0.28, 95%CI=0.18-0.44) when adjusting for age, R-ISS, double hit high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs), extramedullary disease (EMD, excluding paraskeletal plasmacytomas), triple class refractoriness, and the number of lines of therapy (LOTs) received in the preceding 1 year. Likewise compared to ADCs, TCEs were associated with superior PFS (aHRPFS=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.86) and OS (aHROS=0.60, 95%CI=0.39-0.93). Amongst patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) or EMD at the time of BCMA therapy (n=123), median PFS was poor irrespective of the therapeutic class at 1.3, 1.7 and 6.1 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Equally, for patients previously treated with BCMA therapy (n=58), median PFS was poor regardless of class at 1.9, 2.4 and 3 months for ADCs, TCEs and CAR T, respectively. Of 229 relapses the mode of relapse was known in 192 cases (84%), with 101 (52%) having EMD at relapse. Conclusions: While contingent on myriad other factors, patients able to receive BCMA-directed CAR T therapy experience superior survival compared to ADC and TCEs. EMD, PCL and BCMA-exposed populations are recalcitrant to BCMA-directed immunotherapy, and EMD is a common means of relapse.

ADC, N = 591CAR T, N = 1921TCE, N = 1341p-value2
Age (years)61 (56, 68)58 (48, 64)59 (53, 66)0.008
R-ISS 3 at diagnosis5 (8.5%)20 (10%)17 (13%)0.7
Double hit HRCA prior to BCMA4 (6.8%)43 (22%)25 (19%)0.027
Triple class refractory50 (85%)149 (78%)119 (89%)0.029
Penta class refractory37 (63%)61 (32%)65 (49%)<0.001
≥4 LOTs in preceding 1-year10 (17%)14 (7.3%)13 (9.7%)0.089
No. of LOTs prior to BCMA7.00 (5.00, 8.50)5.00 (4.00, 7.00)6.00 (4.00, 7.00)<0.001
EMD/PCL prior to BCMA19 (40%)56 (30%)48 (39%)0.2
BCMA exposed13 (22%)15 (7.8%)30 (22%)<0.001

1 Median(IQR); n(%), 2 Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test; Pearson's Chi-squared test.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 7515)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7515

Abstract #

7515

Abstract Disclosures