In-depth analysis of responders in the phase 3 PhALLCON trial of ponatinib vs imatinib in newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.

Authors

null

Elias Jabbour

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Elias Jabbour , Hagop M. Kantarjian , Ibrahim Aldoss , Pau Montesinos , Jessica Taft Leonard , David Gomez-Almaguer , Maria R. Baer , Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini , James K. McCloskey , Yosuke Minami , Cristina Papayannidis , Philippe Rousselot , Pankit Vachhani , Eunice S. Wang , Lin Yang , Meliessa Hennessy , Alexander Vorog , Niti Patel , Jose-Maria Ribera-Santasusana

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “L. e A. Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, UMR1184, Université de Versailles Paris Saclay, Paris, France, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, MA, ICO – Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, Spain

Research Funding

Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.

Background: Ponatinib, a third-generation BCR::ABL TKI, has potent activity against all clinically relevant BCR::ABL1 variants, including T315I. PhALLCON (NCT03589326), a phase 3 trial comparing frontline TKIs in adults with Ph+ ALL, met its primary endpoint with a higher rate of minimum residual disease–negative (MRD-neg) complete remission (CR) at end of induction (EOI) with ponatinib vs imatinib (34.4%/16.7%; P=0.002). Here, we report response rates of MRD-neg at any time and PFS by age and BCR::ABL1 variant subgroups. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg QD reduced to 15 mg QD upon MRD-neg CR at or after EOI) or imatinib (600 mg QD) plus 20 cycles of reduced-intensity chemotherapy (induction: 3 cycles; consolidation: 6 cycles; maintenance: 11 cycles), followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) was per investigator’s discretion. Post hoc analyses compared MRD-neg (BCR::ABL1IS≤0.01%; MR4) at any time and PFS (any-cause death, failure to achieve CR by EOI, relapse from CR, or failure to achieve/loss of MRD-neg) by age (</≥65 y) and BCR::ABL1 variant (p190/p210). Data cutoff: Aug 12, 2022. Results: In the population of randomized patients (pts) with p190/p210 confirmed by central lab (n=232; 154/78 ponatinib/imatinib; median follow-up 20.1 mo), 68% vs 50% in the ponatinib vs imatinib arms were MRD-neg at any time, with similar benefit of ponatinib across age and variant subgroups (Table). Median PFS was more than twice as long with ponatinib vs imatinib across subgroups (Table). Pts achieving MRD-neg at any time were less likely to have HSCT with ponatinib vs imatinib (32%/56%). Among 107/42 pts without HSCT, exposure was >2-fold longer in the ponatinib vs imatinib arms (median 12.8/5.1 mo) with comparable rates of arterial occlusive (3%/2%) and venous thromboembolic events (11%/12%), and discontinuations due to TEAEs (13%/14%). Conclusions: Ponatinib was superior to imatinib in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy for frontline treatment of Ph+ ALL, with higher rates of MRD-neg at any time, substantially longer PFS across age and BCR::ABL1 variant subgroups, and a safety profile comparable to imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03589326.

OutcomeSubgroupPonatinib (n=154)Imatinib (n=78)Relative risk (95% CI)
MRD-neg at any time, n/N (%)Overall104/154 (68)39/78 (50)1.35 (1.05, 1.73)*
Age <65 y/
≥65 y
83/120 (69)/ 21/34 (62)31/63 (49)/ 8/15 (53)1.41 (1.06, 1.86)*/
1.16 (0.67, 1.99)
p190/
p210
80/114 (70)/ 24/40 (60)30/53 (57)/ 9/25 (36)1.24 (0.95, 1.62)/
1.67 (0.93, 2.98)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Median PFS, moOverall20.07.90.58 (0.41, 0.83)*
Age <65y/
≥65 y
18.7/
22.5
7.3/
7.5
0.50 (0.34, 0.74)*/
0.65 (0.28, 1.49)
p190/
p210
22.5/
9.0
9.3/
4.1
0.52 (0.34, 0.81)*/
0.48 (0.26, 0.90)*

*95% CI did not include 1.00.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Acute Leukemia

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03589326

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 6533)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.6533

Abstract #

6533

Poster Bd #

92

Abstract Disclosures