Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Oluseyi Abidoye , Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi , Kunwer Sufyan Faisal , Manal Imran , Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani , Ammad Raina , Nikita Tripathi , Haidar Abdul-Muhsin , Brian Addis Costello , Parminder Singh , Alan Haruo Bryce , Irbaz Bin Riaz
Background: Previously we have reported comparative effectiveness data regarding survival of first line (1L) treatment options in mRCC. However, it is not known how the life-prolonging frontline combinations compare to patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from each database’s inception through July 1st 2023. Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing 1L immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies for mRCC and reporting HrQoL were included. Small sample size adjusted standardized mean differences (SMD; Hedges’g) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed for global, physical, functional, and emotional QoL. Positive SMD indicated an improvement. A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the comparative HrQoL across different treatment options. P-scores were computed to assess relative treatment rankings. Results: Of 5770 citations identified, five trials (nine references) were included in this analysis. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in the JAVELIN Renal 101 or COSMIC-313 trials yet. Global QoL was significantly improved with cabozantinib-nivolumab (CaboNivo) as compared to Nivo-ipilimumab (SMD 2.74, 95% CI 2.54; 2.93), lenvatinib-pembrolizumab (LenPem; 2.79, 2.53; 3.06), sunitinib (2.87, 2.72; 3.03), Pem-axitinib (PemAxi; 3.09, 2.89; 3.30) and atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AteBev; 3.24, 3.04; 3.45). Global QoL improvement was also observed with NivoIpi compared to sunitinib (0.14, 0.02; 0.25), PemAxi (0.36, 0.18; 0.54) and AteBev (0.51, 0.33; 0.68). Physical QoL improvement were consistent with CaboNivo. Likewise, LenPem significantly improved QoL compared to sunitinib (0.26, 0.04; 0.47), PemAxi (0.38, 0.13; 0.64) and NivoIpi (0.51, 0.27; 0.76). Significant functional QoL benefits were only observed with CaboNivo (0.32, 0.17; 0.48) and NivoIpi (0.19, 0.08; 0.31) compared to sunitinib. No significant mixed treatment comparisons were observed for emotional QoL, however, currently available data suggests that LenPem (rank 1) may potentially improve QoL (Table). Conclusions: CaboNivo and NivoIpi as 1L therapy may offer an improved overall HrQoL compared to other contemporary treatment options in mRCC.
Drug | Global | Physical | Functional | Emotional | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-score | Rank | P-score | Rank | P-score | Rank | P-score | Rank | |
CaboNivo | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.89 | 1 | 0.49 | 3 |
NivoIpi | 0.73 | 2 | 0.02 | 5 | 0.54 | 2 | NA | NA |
LenPem | 0.61 | 3 | 0.75 | 2 | NA | NA | 0.75 | 1 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Rabbia Siddiqi
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Chiara Ciccarese
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Michel Delforge
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Regina Barragan-Carrillo