State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Stephen Lam Chan , Ahmed Omar Kaseb , Wei Shi , Laura Alexander , Xianzhang Meng , CheolHee Park , Kristin Ryan , Arndt Vogel
Background: CARES-310 (NCT03764293) evaluated the combination of the anti-PD-1 inhibitor, camrelizumab (cam), and the VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, rivoceranib (rivo), compared to sorafenib (sor) for the treatment of uHCC. Cam + rivo significantly improved OS and PFS compared to sor (OS, 22.1 months [mo] [95% CI 19.1-27.2] vs 15.2 mo [13.0-18.5] HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.49-0.80]; one-sided p<0.0001); PFS, 5.6 mo [95% CI 5.5-6.3] vs 3.7 mo [2.8-3.7]; HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.41-0.65]; one-sided p<0.0001). The most common (≥20%) grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events for cam + rivo were hypertension (37.5%) and increased AST (16.5%) vs palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (15.2%) for sor. This analysis evaluated PROs stratified by age: <65 yo (baseline, overall cam + rivo n=191, sor n=210) or ≥65 yo (baseline, overall cam + rivo n=81, sor n=61). Methods: Patients completed EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-HCC18 at baseline, each visit, and post-last-dose follow-up periods. Endpoints included time to deterioration (TTD) with a ≥10-point decrease from baseline of patient reported QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and patient-reported symptoms. Results: Mean completion rates across questionnaires were 98.56% and 96.78% for cam + rivo and 98.91% and 98.75% for sor in the <65 and ≥65 yo groups, respectively, from baseline through ≥121 weeks of treatment. In the <65 yo group, cam + rivo vs sor had improved TTD in fatigue measured by EROTC-QLQ-C30. In the ≥65 yo group, cam + rivo had significantly longer median TTD of pain measured by EROTC-QLQ-HCC18 and QLQ-C30, respectively. The median TTD of appetite loss in the ≥65 yo group favored cam + rivo. Median TTD for jaundice was significant for sor in both <65 yo and ≥65 yo group. Median GHS/HRQoL in the ≥65 yo group favored cam + rivo. Conclusions: Cam + rivo was associated with improvement in varied QoL aspects in both patient groups. These PRO results support the clinical benefit and use of cam + rivo in patients with uHCC who have not received prior systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03764293.
<65 Years Old | ≥65 Years Old | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cam + rivo n=191 | sor n=210 | cam + rivo n=81 | sor n=61 | |||
Parameter | mTTD, mo | HR (95 % CI); p-valuec | mTTD, mo | HR (95 % CI); p-valuec | ||
HRQoL/GHSa | NR | NR | 0.97 (0.69, 1.38); p=0.44 | 7.4 | 6.5 | 1.09 (0.61, 1.92); p=0.39 |
Fatiguea | 14.8 | 6.4 | 0.76 (0.55, 1.05); p=0.05 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 1.01 (0.60, 1.71); p=0.48 |
Paina | NR | 12.9 | 0.91 (0.64, 1.30); p=0.30 | 11.2 | 4.6 | 0.56 (0.32, 0.98); p=0.02 |
Appetite lossa | NR | NR | 0.86 (0.59, 1.25); p=0.21 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 0.80 (0.45, 1.41); p=0.22 |
Fatigueb | NR | 5.6 | 0.73 (0.53, 1.03); p=0.03 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 0.92 (0.54, 1.55); p=0.37 |
Jaundiceb | 15.9 | NR | 1.78 (1.14, 2.75); p=0.01 | 6.7 | 11.1 | 2.0 (1.06, 3.81); p=0.02 |
Painb | NR | NR | 1.10 (0.73, 1.63); p=0.33 | 12.9 | 6.8 | 0.47 (0.24, 0.91); p=0.01 |
mTTD, median time to deterioration; NR, not reached. aEORTC QLQ-C30; bEORTC QLQ-HCC18; cone-sided p-value calculated based on log-rank test.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Arndt Vogel
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Linda Wu
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Feng Wen
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Minghao Ruan