Sequential therapy versus first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors

null

Minghao Ruan

The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China

Minghao Ruan , Cheng Yang , Jing Zhao , Kangkang Zhi , Xiaochen Feng , Jin Zhang , Riming Jin , Yao Li , Dong Wu , Hui Liu , Wen Sun , Ruoyu Wang

Organizations

The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China, Department of Special Treatment I and Liver Transplantation, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China, Shanghai Hongkou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China, Department of Vascular Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China, Shanghai, China, The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China, The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China, National Center for Liver Cancer, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

Other
National Natural Science Foundation of China

Background: The treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) evolves, but the optimal sequential strategy for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is still unclear. This study compared the outcome and efficacy of TKI-(TKI+ICI) sequential therapy versus first-line TKI+ICI combination therapy in unresectable HCC. Methods: The patients who had received TKI (lenvatinib or sorafenib) plus ICI (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) as first-line therapy or TKI-(TKI+ICI) sequential therapy were retrospectively included. Treatment efficacy (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) to sequential therapy or TKI+ICI combination therapy as well as treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Among 392 patients included, 55 underwent TKI-(TKI+ICI) sequential therapy and 337 underwent first-line TKI+ICI combination therapy. The median PFS was significantly longer in TKI-(TKI+ICI) group than that in TKI+ICI group (16.2 months versus 7.7 months, HR 0.65 [0.47-0.90]; p=0.009). The median OS was not reached in TKI-(TKI+ICI) group and was 22.8 months in TKI+ICI group (HR 0.53 [0.33-0.83]; p=0.006). Multivariate analyses revealed that Child- Pugh score, BCLC stage and sequential therapy were independently associated with PFS. Child-pugh score, macrovascular invasion (MVI), AFP levels and sequential therapy were independently associated with OS. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with younger age, male gender, an ECOG PS 1, Child-Pugh score A, HBV(+), HCV(-), BCLC stage C, presence of MVI or extrahepatic metastasis could remarkably benefit from sequential therapy. The survival outcome and objective response to TKI+ICI combination therapy was comparable between groups. The incidence of TRAEs were slightly higher in TKI-(TKI+ICI) group (p=0.022), but the difference was not significant for Grade≥3 events (p=0.126). Conclusions: TKI-(TKI+ICI) sequential therapy is a valid therapeutic strategy for patients with HCC compared with first-line TKI+ICI combination therapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16122)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16122

Abstract #

e16122

Abstract Disclosures