Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients (pts) with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) treated with dostarlimab (D) plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) compared with CP in the ENGOT-EN6/GOG3031/RUBY trial.

Authors

Mansoor Mirza

Mansoor Raza Mirza

Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, Nordic Society of Gynaecologic Oncology–Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

Mansoor Raza Mirza, Mark S. Shahin, Matthew A. Powell, Caroline Lundgren, Vladyslav Sukhin, Bhavana Pothuri, Lucy Gilbert, Sarah Gill, Graziana Ronzino, Nicole Suzanne Nevadunsky, Stefan Kommoss, Lyndsay Willmott, Ingrid Boere, Cara Amanda Mathews, Joseph Buscema, Michael Teneriello, Oren Meyers, Jamie Garside, Robert L. Coleman, Brian M. Slomovitz

Organizations

Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, Nordic Society of Gynaecologic Oncology–Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, PA, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology, National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) and Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York City, NY, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, Nancy N and J C Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA, Department of Oncology, Ospedale "Vito Fazzi", Lecce, Italy, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany, Arizona Center for Cancer Care, Phoenix, AZ, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Legorreta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, AZ, US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX, GSK, Collegeville, PA, GSK, London, United Kingdom, Texas Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI), Nashville, TN, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
GSK

Background: In RUBY (NCT03981796), a phase 3, global, randomized, double-blind trial, D+CP demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP (P+CP) in pA/rEC. Methods: 494 pts with pA/rEC were randomized 1:1 to D+CP or P+CP Q3W for 6 cycles (C), followed by D or placebo monotherapy Q6W for ≤2 y. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EN24 (prespecified secondary endpoints) were administered on day 1 of each C, at end of treatment (EOT), and at safety and survival follow-ups. Change (chg) from baseline (BL) to C7 (end of chemotherapy) and C13 (1 y) was calculated in the overall and mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) populations. Least-squares means (LSM) were generated using mixed models for repeated measures, adjusting for correlations across multiple assessments within a pt and controlling for BL global, pain, fatigue, and physical function (PF) scores. Results: In the overall population, PROs were similar with D+CP and P+CP through C7, and no differences between arms across the 3-y period were reported; mean chg from BL to EOT showed numerical improvement with D+CP in back/pelvic pain and deterioration with P+CP in global QOL/GHS, social function (SF), body image, and chg in taste. In the dMMR/MSI-H population, at C7, nominally significant improvements in QOL, PF, role function (RF), pain, and back/pelvic pain were seen with D+CP vs P+CP (Table). Conclusions: Dostarlimab+CP significantly improved PFS and maintained HRQOL in dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations, further supporting its use as a standard of care in pA/rEC. Clinical trial information: NCT03981796.

Mean (SD) chg from BL at C7 and C13.

dMMR/MSI-H Overall
C7C13C7C13
D+CPP+CPD+CPP+CPD+CPP+CPD+CPP+CP
GHS/QOL 1.4 (23.33)a−6.0 (26.12) 9.2 (17.30) −8.5 (15.86) −1.8 (22.79) −2.3 (23.10) 3.3 (23.51) −0.9 (19.25)
PF −1.6 (15.64)a−6.4 (22.14) 7.7 (14.01) −5.2 (10.26) −6.9 (22.82) −6.8 (21.09) 2.4 (20.64) −0.1 (18.22)
RF 4.8 (33.12)a−12.2 (31.87) 10.6 (33.66) −10.7 (23.01) −6.9 (34.88) −8.4 (32.94) 4.6 (33.56) −0.2 (28.17)
Emotional function 3.6 (15.56) 1.0 (28.66) 5.8 (14.17) 2.9 (20.49) 2.0 (18.75) 2.5 (22.64) 5.4 (20.16) 4.0 (19.85)
Cognitive function −3.8 (17.13) −9.1 (27.92) −1.3 (17.64) −7.3 (19.35) −4.8 (19.78) −6.8 (21.70) −3.2 (16.95) −4.6 (21.73)
SF 0.0 (30.08) −9.8 (25.22) 6.1 (24.00) −2.4 (18.34) −3.8 (31.55) −4.5 (27.08) 3.8 (25.90) 1.8 (21.39)
Painb−13.6 (26.71)a6.6 (26.10) −9.3 (31.24) 8.3 (21.60) −3.6 (30.85) 1.1 (26.34) −2.4 (34.02) 2.1 (22.52)
Fatigueb5.1 (22.15) 12.3 (26.90) −5.4 (21.27) 0.1 (17.36) 10.3 (26.67) 9.0 (26.78) −1.2 (22.73) −2.4 (19.40)
Back/pelvic painb−17.6 (25.42)a−5.0 (32.99) −16.1 (29.85) 2.5 (35.64) −10.1 (31.89) −6.3 (30.62) −5.6 (35.72) −3.0 (25.90)

aNominally significant LSM difference between arms (P<.05). bLower scores indicate reduced symptom severity.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Patient Experience,Survivorship

Sub Track

Integrating Patient Experience Assessment and Patient Reported Outcomes Into Practice

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03981796

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 332)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.332

Abstract #

332

Poster Bd #

E17

Abstract Disclosures