Relative and functioning sleep disturbance and fatigue: Impact on patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors

Elif Andac-Jones

Elif Andac-Jones

Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC

Elif Andac-Jones , Abigail Newell , Elizabeth A. Szamreta , Maria Belen Gonzalo , Juliette Hoffman , Matthew Monberg

Organizations

Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

Background: Sleep disturbance and fatigue are prevalent among ovarian cancer patients and are associated with poor mental health and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes; while this has been well-documented, we know less about the factors that may contribute, what cancer patients perceive as contributing to their issues, and how they describe and manage these issues across their treatment trajectory. Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 20 stage III/IV ovarian cancer patients diagnosed within three years with varied treatment trajectory, race/ethnicity, and location. A screener included PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Fatigue measures, sociodemographics, and cancer history. Transcripts were analyzed using deductive codes of sleep and fatigue and inductive codes based on emergent themes. We identify two novel concepts of patients’ sleep and fatigue experiences: relative and functioning. Relative fatigue and sleep issues capture how patients self-report relative to different points in their treatment. Functioning concept shows how patients reinterpret and self-censor the severity and impact of their sleep and fatigue by emphasizing their ability to overcome exhaustion or insomnia. Results: All twenty patients reported persistent, debilitating fatigue, difficulty falling and staying asleep through the course of their disease, which negatively impacted their HRQoL and activities of daily living. The majority of patients struggled to complete daily chores (17/20), keep up with paid work (9/10), and maintain relationships(16/20). Although patients experience fatigue across their trajectories, the majority of patients described their fatigue as more intense during chemotherapy than maintenance therapy. Patients struggled to evaluate their current fatigue and sleep without reflecting on previous treatment experiences (relative), and continuously reinterpreted their levels of fatigue and sleep based on how much of their daily functions they could complete (functioning). Patients self-censor in reporting to meet their perceived expectations of their care provider/data collector. Although fatigue and sleep disturbance significantly impaired their HRQoL, patients framed their experiences positively and minimized their struggles. Conclusions: We conclude that PROMIS measures are important in evaluating baseline sleep disturbance and fatigue in patients with ovarian cancer. However, patients’ reporting is informed by their previous treatment experiences, subject to continued reinterpretation. Therefore 1) more nuanced and repeated measures including patients’ narratives are needed to understand the complexity of patients’ experiences; and 2) Patients’ self-censorship and filtering need to be considered. Future research will test these new concepts with a 200 patient survey.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Late and Long-Term Adverse Effects

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e24102)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e24102

Abstract #

e24102

Abstract Disclosures