Efficacy of subsequent therapies in patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial according to whether disease progression occurred during or after the end of olaparib (ola) maintenance.

Authors

null

Philipp Harter

Kliniken Essen-Mitte, and AGO, Essen, Germany

Philipp Harter , Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier , Domenica Lorusso , Claire Cropet , Eva M. Guerra , Pia Wolfrum-Ristau , Takashi Matsumoto , Ignace Vergote , Nicoletta Colombo , Johanna Unelma Maenpaa , Coriolan Lebreton , Nikolaus de Gregorio , Anna Maria Mosconi , Maria Jesús Rubio-Pérez , Hugues Bourgeois , Peter A. Fasching , Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard , Dominik Denschlag , Eric Pujade-Lauraine , Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard

Organizations

Kliniken Essen-Mitte, and AGO, Essen, Germany, Centre Jean Perrin, and GINECO, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Istituto Tumori Milano + Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, and MITO, Rome, Italy, Centre Léon Bérard, and GINECO, Lyon, France, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, and GEICO, Madrid, Spain, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and AGO Au, Salzburg, Austria, Ehime University Hospital, and GOTIC, Tōon, Japan, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, and BGOG, Leuven, Belgium, University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, and MANGO, Milan, Italy, Tampere University Hospital, and NSGO, Tampere, Finland, Institut Bergonié, and GINECO, Bordeaux, France, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, and AGO, Ulm, Germany, S.C. di Oncologia Medica Osp. S. Maria della Misericordia – AO di Perugia, and MITO, Perugia, Italy, Hospital Reina Sofia, and GEICO, Cordoba, Spain, Centre Jean Bernard – Clinique Victor Hugo, and GINECO, Le Mans, France, Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen, and AGO, Erlangen, Germany, Centre CARIO – HPCA, and GINECO, Plérin Sur Mer, France, Hochtaunuskliniken, and AGO, Bad Homburg, Germany, ARCAGY Research, and GINECO, Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
This work was supported by ARCAGY Research, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche

Background: In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644), maintenance ola (a PARP inhibitor) + bevacizumab (bev) led to prolonged progression-free and overall survival vs placebo (pbo) + bev in AOC pts, specifically those with homologous recombination-deficient (HRD+) tumors (Ray-Coquard et al. ESMO 2022, LBA29). Here, we explore the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy (CT) in pts after progression on first-line (1L) treatment in PAOLA-1. Methods: The efficacy of subsequent CT was explored by analyzing the median time from first subsequent therapy (FST) to second subsequent therapy (SST). Efficacy was compared by FST type, HRD status, and timing of progression (during/after ola). A multivariate Cox model was used in ola + bev pts to identify prognostic factors influencing time from FST to SST, including HRD status, platinum-free interval (PFI), clinical risk based on disease stage and surgical status, timing of progression, and response to 1L CT. All P values are exploratory. Results: In total, 544/806 (67.5%) pts progressed and received subsequent CT: 338/537 (62.9%) ola + bev pts and 206/269 (76.6%) pbo + bev pts. In the overall population and in the subgroup who received platinum-based combination therapy (PBC), time from FST to SST was shortest in pts who progressed during ola (Table). Pts who progressed after ola had similar outcomes to pbo + bev pts (Table). Efficacy was broadly consistent regardless of HRD status (Table). The multivariate analysis confirmed that progression after (vs during) ola prolonged time from FST to SST (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.84; P=0.0011) independently of other known prognostic factors, such as PFI ≥12 vs <12 months (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.29–0.51; P<0.0001) or lower vs higher clinical risk (0.58, 0.42–0.81; P=0.0015). Conclusions: In this post hoc exploratory analysis of PAOLA-1, the efficacy of subsequent CT at relapse appeared dependent on whether progression occurred during or after the end of ola treatment. Efficacy was reduced when relapse occurred during ola but was comparable between pts who progressed after ola vs pbo + bev pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02477644.

Time from FST to SST.

FSTProgression during olaProgression
after ola
Pbo + bev
Any CT6.1
(4.9–7.3)
n=192*
11.4
(10.2–13.2)
n=145*
11.9
(10.8–12.9)
n=206
HRD+7.2
(5.5–8.6)
n=55
12.7
(10.2–15.5)
n=66
13.9
(11.4–17.0)
n=100
HRD–6.0
(4.4–7.7)
n=98
10.6
(9.7–15.4)
n=53
10.8
(9.5–12.5)
n=66
PBC7.3
(5.7–8.4)
n=157
12.0
(10.3–14.8)
n=132
12.9
(11.8–14.1)
n=162
HRD+7.3
(6.3–9.6)
n=46
12.7
(10.2–15.5)
n=64
14.3
(12.4–19.0)
n=85
HRD–6.6
(4.6–8.6)
n=81
12.9
(10.3–17.2)
n=46
11.8
(10.6–13.2)
n=47

*1/338 pts not treated. Kaplan–Meier estimates; median months with 95% CIs. HRD+ defined as tumor BRCA mutation and/or genomic instability score ≥42 (Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02477644

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 5550)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5550

Abstract #

5550

Poster Bd #

245

Abstract Disclosures