Cost-effective analysis of rotational intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (RIPAC) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Soo Jin Park

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Soo Jin Park , Juwon Lim , Hee Seung Kim

Organizations

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Commercializations Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes grant funded by the Korea government

Background: We developed RIPAC, which improves distribution and penetration compared to pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). To introduce this newly developed device in the real world, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of rotational intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (RIPAC) device to improve quality of life (QoL) compared to conventional palliative chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Methods: A decision tree was designed to compare the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and cost consisting of RIPAC and palliative chemotherapy regimens, such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine (GEM), and topotecan (TOP). Also, to reflect the clinician’s variable preferred regimens for palliative chemotherapy, the average direct and indirect medical costs of belotecan, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and vinblastine were also considered in addition to the three regimens (ANY). The model included quality of life which was measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality of life Questionnaire 30 (QLQ-C30) data gathered from previous clinical trial reports on PIPAC and palliative chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at US$40,000 per quality-adjusted life year saved. Results: To complete three cycles of palliative chemotherapy using PLD, GEM, TOP, and ANY, the total medical costs were US$15,267, US$9,013, US$16,144, and US$12,631, respectively, and the corresponding QALYs for each regimen were 0.633, 0.553, 0.783, and 0.65. Since RIPAC has not yet been introduced into the medical market, when the maximum RIPAC cost is calculated from ANY considering WTP, the cost of RIPAC excluding the ward, outpatient, and anesthesia-related costs among direct medical costs was estimated to be up to US$4,391. Conclusions: The cost-effective analysis results for the palliative treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer implied that RIPAC could be a cost-effective strategy to improve the QoL of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e17585)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e17585

Abstract #

e17585

Abstract Disclosures