Tele-oncology implementation logic model.

Authors

null

Amir Alishahi Tabriz

University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Amir Alishahi Tabriz , Kea Turner , Cristina Naso , Brian D. Gonzalez , Laura B. Oswald , Oliver Nguyen , Julie E. Hallanger-Johnson , Krupal Patel , Young-Rock Hong , Byron J Powell , Philippe E. Spiess

Organizations

University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Department of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed the landscape of oncology practice and placed tele-oncology at the center of cancer care delivery. As tele-oncology will likely remain a key part of cancer care delivery, healthcare organizations need to determine how to implement tele-oncology programs. We conducted an instrumental case study at a National Cancer Institutes -designated comprehensive cancer center that successfully implemented tele-oncology. Methods: Data were collected from three sources between June 2020–February 2022. We conducted semi-structured interviews among stakeholders directly involved in implementing and/or managing tele-oncology and surveys of administrators of the center’s tele-oncology and clinicians who used the program. Document analysis of implementation deliverables were also analyzed. Data collection and analyses were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and Clinical Transformation in Technology. We used the Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) to develop a framework depicting determinants and key steps for implementing tele-oncology. Results: We interviewed 40 clinicians. We also invited 364 employees to complete online surveys, of which 151 (41.5%) responded. Most respondents were physicians (41.7%), nurse practitioners (26.5%), or physician assistants (26.5%). To implement tele-oncology program, three elements should be considered: (1) platform, (2) people, and (3) process. We found hospitals should: 1) adopt a safe and adaptable platform to deliver tele-oncology; 2) build a multidisciplinary tele-oncology team to provide the administrative, legal, workflow, and clinical support; 3) provide training and resources to make sure all the team members can deliver their responsibilities; 4) identify and appreciate early adopters, departments, and clinicians with successful experiences; 5) frequently evaluate the clinical and implementation outcomes; 6) secure reimbursement comparable with in-person rate and ; 7) advocate for policies that are supportive of tele-oncology in the future. Conclusions: Using IRLM we presented the tele-oncology implementation framework that can be used by hospitals around the world to implement their own tele-oncology.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Telemedicine/Remote Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e13681)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e13681

Abstract #

e13681

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Telemedicine services in community oncology practices.

First Author: Kah Poh Loh

First Author: Al Bowen Benson III