Resource and reimbursement barriers to comprehensive cancer care (CCC) delivery: An association of community cancer centers (ACCC) survey research analysis.

Authors

null

Al Bowen Benson

Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL

Al Bowen Benson, Leigh Boehmer, Latha Shivakumar, Julia Rachel Trosman, Christine B. Weldon, Elizabeth A. Hahn, Sheetal Mehta Kircher

Organizations

Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, Association of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, MD, Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

Other
Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC).

Background: CCC delivery is recommended in guidelines, required by accreditation bodies, and essential for high-quality cancer management. Barriers, such as insufficient reimbursement and lack of specialist staff, prevent consistent access to and delivery of CCC, particularly supportive oncology services. Challenges especially persist in community programs, where access to philanthropy and similar funding is limited. ACCC conducted a representative survey of its member programs to elucidate capacity and barriers to CCC delivery in the community/academic setting in order to inform policy and value-based payment reform. Methods: Survey development methodology included item generation with expert review, iterative piloting and cognitive interviews to achieve content and internal validity. An online survey was piloted at the ACCC 2018 Annual Meeting and sent to member programs via email link. The final survey included 22 questions on availability and funding for supportive services. Twenty-seven supportive oncology services were assessed for availability, reasons not offered, reimbursement/funding and patient payment. Analyses were conducted with SAS. Results: 172 of 704 ACCC member programs responded and completed the majority of survey as of 10/7/19. Despite a high proportion of programs offering supportive oncology services, gaps between cost and reimbursement were present for all (Table). Deficits in reimbursement are compensated by patient out-of-pocket payments, grants and donations. Most centers report needing more staffing in psychology (61%), social work (60%), navigation (59%), nutrition (57%), palliative care (56%), genetic counseling (52%), and financial counseling (53%). Gaps were observed regardless of region or practice type. Conclusions: There is a lack of sufficient reimbursement, staffing, and budget to provide CCC across the U.S., regardless of region or practice type. Oncology care models and reimbursement policies must include CCC services to optimize delivery of care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

On-Demand Poster Session: Cost, Value, and Policy

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy

Sub Track

Value-Based Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 31)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.31

Abstract #

31

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Al Bowen Benson III

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Telemedicine services in community oncology practices.

First Author: Kah Poh Loh