Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs placebo for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy: Subgroup analyses from the phase 3 CheckMate 914 (part A) trial.

Authors

null

Robert J. Motzer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Robert J. Motzer , Paul Russo , Viktor Grünwald , Yoshihiko Tomita , Philippe Barthélémy , Jeffrey C. Goh , Hernán Javier Cutuli , Burcin Simsek , Julia Spiridigliozzi , Aleksander Chudnovsky , Axel Bex

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumor Research) and Clinic for Urology, West-German Cancer Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France, ICON Research, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia, Sirio Libanes Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: In part A of the CheckMate 914 trial, adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) did not improve disease-free survival (DFS) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of post-nephrectomy relapse (Motzer RJ, et al. Lancet 2023). Exploratory analyses were conducted to better understand outcomes in key pt subsets and with early NIVO+IPI discontinuation. Methods: Key study inclusion criteria were radical/partial nephrectomy with negative margins > 4 and ≤ 12 weeks before randomization; predominant clear cell histology; pathological TNM stage T2a (grade [G] 3/4) N0M0, T2b-T4 (any G) N0M0, or any pT (any G) N1M0; and no evidence of residual disease/metastases. Pts in part A were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg Q2W (× 12) + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W (× 4) or equivalent PBO for 24 weeks or until recurrence/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is DFS per blinded independent central review. Exploratory analyses assessed DFS by key subsets including Fuhrman grade, sarcomatoid features (yes/no), PD-L1 expression, and NIVO+IPI exposure (≤ 6 cycles [1–2 IPI doses] vs > 6 cycles [3–4 IPI doses]). Safety was assessed by exposure. Results: 816 pts were randomized to adjuvant NIVO+IPI (N = 405) or PBO (N = 411). At 37.0 months median follow-up (min, 15.4 months), subset analyses suggested a DFS benefit for NIVO+IPI vs PBO in pts with Fuhrman grade 4 or sarcomatoid features. DFS by PD-L1 expression will be reported in the presentation. Pts who received > 6 NIVO+IPI cycles trended toward improved DFS vs pts receiving ≤ 6 NIVO+IPI cycles. Of the 102 pts who received ≤ 6 NIVO+IPI cycles, 3% had sarcomatoid features, and 20% had Fuhrman grade 4; treatment discontinuation in these pts was due to study drug toxicity (75%), unrelated adverse events (AEs; 6%), pt request (5%), recurrence (4%), consent withdrawal/non-compliance (4%), or other (6%), and most pts receiving ≤ 6 NIVO+IPI cycles were discontinued without initial dose delay (NIVO, 84%; IPI, 89%). In the group of patients who received ≤ 6 NIVO+IPI cycles, grade 1–2 all-cause AEs were reported in 35% of pts (grade ≥ 3, 63%) and 31% of pts discontinued treatment due to grade 1–2 all-cause AEs (grade ≥ 3, 44%). Conclusions: Exploratory analyses suggest that tumor grade and sarcomatoid features influence outcomes with adjuvant NIVO+IPI. Limited NIVO+IPI exposure (≤ 6 cycles) and discontinuation for low-grade AEs may have contributed to the lack of DFS benefit observed in CheckMate 914 part A. Clinical trial information: NCT03138512.

NIVO+IPIPBODFS HR (95% CI)
Fuhrman grade1-2n = 136n = 1470.95 (0.58-1.57)
2n = 126n = 1360.97 (0.58-1.62)
3n = 189n = 1731.08 (0.73-1.60)
4n = 80n = 910.72 (0.44-1.18)
NIVO+IPI exposure≤ 6 cyclesn = 1020.74 (0.48-1.13)
> 6 cyclesn = 302

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03138512

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 4506)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4506

Abstract #

4506

Abstract Disclosures