Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Dean F. Bajorin , Johannes Alfred Witjes , Jürgen Gschwend , Michael Schenker , Begoña P. Valderrama , Yoshihiko Tomita , Aristotelis Bamias , Thierry Lebret , Shahrokh Shariat , Se Hoon Park , Dingwei Ye , Mads Agerbaek , Sandra Collette , Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz , Dimitrios Zardavas , Henry B. Koon , Matt D. Galsky
Background: The standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with MIUC is radical surgery ± cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo), but many pts are cisplatin-ineligible. There is no conclusive evidence supporting adjuvant chemo in pts who did not receive neoadjuvant chemo and in those with residual disease after neoadjuvant cisplatin. This phase 3 trial of adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) in pts with MIUC after radical surgery ± neoadjuvant cisplatin (CheckMate 274) aims to address an unmet need in these pts. We report the initial results. Methods: This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of NIVO vs PBO in pts with high-risk MIUC (bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis) after radical surgery. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg Q2W or PBO for ≤ 1 year of adjuvant treatment. Pts had radical surgery within 120 days ± neoadjuvant cisplatin or were ineligible/declined cisplatin-based chemo, evidence of UC at high risk of recurrence per pathologic staging, were disease-free by imaging, and ECOG PS ≤ 1. Primary endpoints: disease-free survival (DFS) in all randomized pts (ITT population) and in pts with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%. DFS was stratified by nodal status, prior neoadjuvant cisplatin, and PD-L1 status. Non–urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS) in ITT pts and in pts with PD-L ≥ 1% is a secondary endpoint. Safety is an exploratory endpoint. Results: In total, 353 pts were randomized to NIVO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 140) and 356 pts to PBO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 142). The primary endpoint of DFS was met in ITT pts (median follow-up, 20.9 mo for NIVO; 19.5 mo for PBO) and in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. DFS and NUTRFS were improved with NIVO vs PBO in both populations (Table). DFS improvement with NIVO was generally consistent across subgroups. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17.9% and 7.2% of pts in the NIVO and PBO arms, respectively. Conclusions: NIVO demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs PBO for MIUC after radical surgery, both in ITT pts and pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. AEs were manageable and consistent with previous reports. These results support adjuvant NIVO as a new SOC for pts with MIUC with high risk for recurrence despite neoadjuvant chemo or those ineligible for and/or declining cisplatin-based chemo. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409. Research Sponsor: Bristol Myers Squibb
NIVO | PBO | HR (CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Median DFS (95% CI), mo | ITT | 21.0 (17.1–33.4) | 10.9 (8.3–13.9) | 0.70 (0.54–0.89)a; P = 0.0006 |
PD-L1 ≥ 1% | NR (22.0–NE) | 10.8 (5.7–21.2) | 0.53 (0.34–0.84)b; P = 0.0004 | |
Median NUTRFS (95% CI), mo | ITT | 24.6 (19.2–35.0) | 13.7 (8.4–20.7) | 0.72 (0.58–0.89)c |
PD-L1 ≥ 1% | NR (26.0–NE) | 10.9 (5.8–22.1) | 0.54 (0.38–0.77)c | |
Any-grade TRAEs, n (%) | 272 (77.5) | 193 (55.5) | – | |
Grade 3–4 TRAEs, n (%)d | 63 (17.9) | 25 (7.2) |
a98.31% CI.b98.87% CI. c95% CI. dThere were 2 deaths due to pneumonitis in the NIVO arm. NE, not estimable; NR, not reached.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Robert J. Motzer
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Matt D. Galsky
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Petros Grivas
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Matt D. Galsky